1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90711-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blunt intestinal injury in children: The role of the physical examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue is: ''When and for which signs the surgery should be indicated if the pneumoperitoneum is absent?'' [10,11,14]. We agree with Bruny and Bensard [12] that persistent peritoneal irritation associated with the changes in temperature, heart rate, leukocytosis, and low urinary output, despite anti-shock treatment, are very suspicious of occult gastrointestinal perforation, especially if the transverse abdominal wall ecchymoses are evident.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The issue is: ''When and for which signs the surgery should be indicated if the pneumoperitoneum is absent?'' [10,11,14]. We agree with Bruny and Bensard [12] that persistent peritoneal irritation associated with the changes in temperature, heart rate, leukocytosis, and low urinary output, despite anti-shock treatment, are very suspicious of occult gastrointestinal perforation, especially if the transverse abdominal wall ecchymoses are evident.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Whyte et al present a similar case, their patient was operated 4 h after injury and she was discharged after 20 days without any complication. Nevertheless the relationship between delayed surgery and high morbidity is still controversial [10][11][12][13]. The issue is: ''When and for which signs the surgery should be indicated if the pneumoperitoneum is absent?''…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large retrospective study suggested the rate of intra-abdominal injury to be 21% in the presence of the seat belt sign; however, that study was subject to selection bias as it only included hospitalized patients. 20 In addition, the rate of gastrointestinal injuries in those with seat belt signs (11% of those undergoing definitive abdominal testing) was lower compared to the nearly 25% identified in prior studies. 24,25 The rate of pancreatic injuries in those with seat belt signs was only 1% in the current study, which is lower than the 7% in the prior prospective study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Pediatric studies of this topic primarily consist of case series or retrospective reviews. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] A single-center prospective study demonstrated an association between the seat belt sign and intra-abdominal injury in children, but was limited by its small sample size. 25 In contrast, one pediatric study failed to demonstrate any association between the seat belt sign and intra-abdominal injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intestinal A incidência de lesão intestinal na criança em trauma abdominal fechado é de 1,4%, e, segundo Jerby 15 , o diagnóstico pode ser feito em 94% das crianças através do exame físico. Os principais sinais são de irritação peritoneal: abdome em tábua, paracentese positiva para conteúdo fecal ou alimento, e o tratamento geralmente é cirúrgico.…”
Section: Trauma Abdominalunclassified