2018
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Prefabrication Subcutaneous Small Animal Model for the Evaluation of Bone Substitute Materials

Abstract: Because of the size of bone substitute material particles, large animal bone defect models are usually required for the assessment of these materials. However, these models have several disadvantages including high cost, complicated operation procedures, ethical issues, and difficulties in sample analysis. In addition, for mimicking the bone environment, conventional subcutaneous models require the addition of osteogenic factors and stem cells, resulting in an expensive model with a complex experimental proced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, the cells were fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde for immunofluorescence and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation, to show growth, spread and morphology of stimulated macrophages 34 .…”
Section: The Osteoimmunomodulatory Effects Of Ppox Nanotopographic Su...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the cells were fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde for immunofluorescence and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation, to show growth, spread and morphology of stimulated macrophages 34 .…”
Section: The Osteoimmunomodulatory Effects Of Ppox Nanotopographic Su...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porcine hydroxyapatite (PHA) was prepared according to our previous studies [ 68 , 69 ]. Briefly, cancellous bone harvested from the porcine femoral epiphysis was immersed in 30% H 2 O 2 and 75% ethanol respectively for 24 ​h to remove soft tissues.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For bone applications, the subcutaneous model is also used to test vascularization prior the orthotopic model [ 160 , 168 , 176 ]. However, the lack of anatomic, biomechanical and biochemical similarities between the subcutaneous and orthotopic location renders this model insufficient for studying in vivo new tissue formation and mechanical performance of scaffolds [ 192 ]. Nevertheless, in the case of cartilage, several studies report new tissue formation in 3D bioprinted scaffolds implanted subcutaneously (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Open Questions and Unmet Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%