1995
DOI: 10.1051/jp3:1995218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Cell Biomechanics Evaluated by the Single-Cell Micromanipulation

Abstract: Assessed by the micromanipulation technique, the main mechanical properties of blood cells (red cell and white cell) are reviewed. Hyperelasticity of red blood cell membrane is characterized and corresponding material coefficients are given. Surface tension and cell viscosity of leukocyte are discussed and related values are stated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that our measured values for K A for the healthy RBCs are in agreement with recent studies based on measuring the dynamic membrane fluctuation which reveal that K A is in the range of 1–10 μNm −1 [22,23]. However, these values for K A for the healthy RBCs are lower than the values reported from micropipette aspiration studies which find K A to be in the range of 300–500 mN m −1 [21,24,25]. This large discrepancy between the micropipette-based technique and the measurement of dynamic membrane fluctuation can be rationalized by the fact that the former probes behavior dominated by the lipid bilayer and the latter deals with behavior dominated by the spectrin network.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that our measured values for K A for the healthy RBCs are in agreement with recent studies based on measuring the dynamic membrane fluctuation which reveal that K A is in the range of 1–10 μNm −1 [22,23]. However, these values for K A for the healthy RBCs are lower than the values reported from micropipette aspiration studies which find K A to be in the range of 300–500 mN m −1 [21,24,25]. This large discrepancy between the micropipette-based technique and the measurement of dynamic membrane fluctuation can be rationalized by the fact that the former probes behavior dominated by the lipid bilayer and the latter deals with behavior dominated by the spectrin network.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, these values for K A for the healthy RBCs are lower than the values reported from micropipette aspiration studies, i.e. in the range of 300– 500 mN m −1 [21,24,25]. As discussed earlier in Section 2.5 in detail, this discrepancy between the micropipette-based method and the membrane fluctuation based technique can be attributed by the fact that the former tends to probe the lipid bilayer and the latter the spectrin network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…These values are summarized in Table 1. Accordingly, we derived the shear modulus (μ) and the area expansion modulus (dilation elasticity, κ) based on the following equations (30,31) under the condition of 1 < ΔL/R p < 5 (linear response region in Fig. 5B), respectively:…”
Section: Applied Physical Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the appearance of such a small pore on the DNA gel network might lead the droplet flow into the pipette above the critical length (ΔL c ). This phenomenon corresponds to the fact that the DNA shell has a small shear modulus (μ) and a large area expansion modulus (κ), i.e., κ/μ >> 1 (Table 1), which is similar to cells with cytoskeletons, such as red blood cells and white cells (30,31,38).…”
Section: Applied Physical Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also obtain the same scaled standard deviation from the study of Evans et al [26] who found G s = 9 ± 1.7. Lelièvre et al [37] found G s = 4.5 ± 0.8 and thus their scaled standard deviation is 0.44.…”
Section: Nature and Shear Modulus Of The Erythrocyte Membranementioning
confidence: 99%