2021
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-327370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood-based high sensitivity measurements of beta-amyloid and phosphorylated tau as biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease: a focused review on recent advances

Abstract: Discovery and development of clinically useful biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias have been the focus of recent research efforts. While cerebrospinal fluid and positron emission tomography or MRI-based neuroimaging markers have made the in vivo detection of AD pathology and its consequences possible, the high cost and invasiveness have limited their widespread use in the clinical setting. On the other hand, advances in potentially more accessible blood-based biomarkers had been imped… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AUCs improved as the CL threshold was increased. This compares favourably with other Simoa Aβ and pTau analyses whose AUCs range between 0.66 to 0.88 [11, 31-33], and is similar to AUCs for the only current FDA-approved plasma test for determining amyloid positivity, which in a cohort of predominately CDR-SOB 0 had an AUC of 0.88 and 0.94 when run without and with other covariates of age and APOE ε 4 on a mass spectrometry platform [34]. In the AIBL study cohort, addition of APOE ε 4, sex, age and PET tracer only marginally improved the performance of the plasma test, potentially reducing the need for measuring other parameters when used as a trial-screening tool.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The AUCs improved as the CL threshold was increased. This compares favourably with other Simoa Aβ and pTau analyses whose AUCs range between 0.66 to 0.88 [11, 31-33], and is similar to AUCs for the only current FDA-approved plasma test for determining amyloid positivity, which in a cohort of predominately CDR-SOB 0 had an AUC of 0.88 and 0.94 when run without and with other covariates of age and APOE ε 4 on a mass spectrometry platform [34]. In the AIBL study cohort, addition of APOE ε 4, sex, age and PET tracer only marginally improved the performance of the plasma test, potentially reducing the need for measuring other parameters when used as a trial-screening tool.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Additional promising approaches to further improve PSCI prediction include assessment of co-occurring Alzheimer pathology (e.g. using cerebrospinal fluid analysis, amyloid PET imaging ( Ossenkoppele et al, 2015 ) or blood-based measurements ( Chong et al, 2021 ), brain perfusion (e.g. using transcranial Doppler ( Vinciguerra et al, 2019 ) or arterial spin labeling MRI ( van den Brink et al, 2021 ), and brain plasticity and reserve (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous studies, extracellular senile plaques composed of deposits of β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) of hyperphosphorylated tau protein are widely recognized as pathological hallmarks of AD ( Jack et al, 2013 ; Chong et al, 2021 ). However, despite great expectations, only a small number of antibodies targeting Aβ or tau have been selected for investigation in clinical trials ( Long and Holtzman, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%