2019
DOI: 10.1111/cod.13266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blocking type 2 inflammation by dupilumab does not control classic (type 1‐driven) allergic contact dermatitis in chronic hand eczema

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…63,64 Interestingly, in 1 case report, dupilumab administration resulted in the onset of recall dermatitis at the patch test site for colophony 24 hours after administration, suggestive of nonetype 2 immune pathways contributing to underlying dermatitis. 65 62 64 adults with AD 17 with PTþACD 14 with SACD 33 without ACD Retrospective study 64 7 adults with localized dermatitis refractory to dupilumab were PT 6 adults underwent PT before dupilumab Retrospective study 66 15 adults with AD with hand dermatitis and/or childhood AD had PT performed Retrospective study 63 48 adults with AD underwent PT Case report 65 42-year-old female with colophony allergy Case report 67 A 54-year-old surgeon with hand dermatitis refractory to dupilumab had a PT Case report 68 A 44-year-old man with nickel allergy to metal endovascular stents on MMF and prednisone After treatment, patients with PTþACD and SACD had similar decreases in BSA, IGA, and pruritus compared with those without ACD. All 7 patients had at least 1 positive PT result, with at least >1 or stronger reaction.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63,64 Interestingly, in 1 case report, dupilumab administration resulted in the onset of recall dermatitis at the patch test site for colophony 24 hours after administration, suggestive of nonetype 2 immune pathways contributing to underlying dermatitis. 65 62 64 adults with AD 17 with PTþACD 14 with SACD 33 without ACD Retrospective study 64 7 adults with localized dermatitis refractory to dupilumab were PT 6 adults underwent PT before dupilumab Retrospective study 66 15 adults with AD with hand dermatitis and/or childhood AD had PT performed Retrospective study 63 48 adults with AD underwent PT Case report 65 42-year-old female with colophony allergy Case report 67 A 54-year-old surgeon with hand dermatitis refractory to dupilumab had a PT Case report 68 A 44-year-old man with nickel allergy to metal endovascular stents on MMF and prednisone After treatment, patients with PTþACD and SACD had similar decreases in BSA, IGA, and pruritus compared with those without ACD. All 7 patients had at least 1 positive PT result, with at least >1 or stronger reaction.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual incidence of contact dermatitis in most countries ranged from 5.7 to 101 cases per 100,000 employees/year. The most reliable studies estimate it between 11 and 86 cases per 100000 employees/year [12] [13]. Indeed, Ahn Y-S et al [14] estimated this incidence to be 78 cases per 100,000 workers in the United Kingdom, while in Singapore in 2007, Gan W-H et al [15] found an annual incidence of occupational contact dermatitis of 400/100,000 conscripts/year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another more rare location is the face [12], in particular the eyelids by airborne mechanism (volatile products) or due to contact with contaminated hands or gloves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent case reports have also shown treatment failure of dupilumab for cases of occupational allergic and irritant contact dermatitis [ 14 , 15 ]. Our case series is the first to describe the long-term follow-up of up to 30 months in recalcitrant cases of both allergic and irritant occupation-related contact dermatitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%