2019
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2018.2836144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blockchain-Based Decentralized Trust Management in Vehicular Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
346
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 676 publications
(346 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
346
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 26). It is worth noting that in [205] the transactions carrying vehicle reports are essentially unspendable. The RSUs employ weighted average to the rating scores to estimate the quality of the received reports.…”
Section: B Access Control and Self-organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 26). It is worth noting that in [205] the transactions carrying vehicle reports are essentially unspendable. The RSUs employ weighted average to the rating scores to estimate the quality of the received reports.…”
Section: B Access Control and Self-organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In traditional DPoS consensus schemes, miners are selected from miner candidates according to stake-based voting among stakeholders, i.e., vehicles with stake. In BIoV, as RSUs acting as miner candidates may be distributed along the road without sufficient security protection, they are semi-trusted and may be vulnerable to be directly compromised by attackers [1], [23]. Both stakeholders and miner candidates are vulnerable to arbitrary manipulation by plutocrats [16], and become compromised stakeholders and malicious miner candidates.…”
Section: B Adversary Model For Dpos Consensus Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unsuccessful transmission probability of data packets ranges from 0% to 40%, and the initial reputation of all the workers is 0.5. We compare the proposed MSL scheme with a Traditional Subjective Logic (TSL) scheme from [7], and an Aggregated Trust Value (ATV) scheme referred to [15]. In the ATV scheme, reputation is calculated by aggregating trust value offsets with different weights from the task publishers.…”
Section: A Simulation Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%