Blockchain adoption in food supply chains: a review and implementation framework

Vu, Nam Hoang; Ghadge, Abhijeet; Bourlakis, Michael

doi:10.1080/09537287.2021.1939902

Cited by 109 publications

(97 citation statements)

References 97 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…ASC always remains under stringent scrutiny from audit and regulatory bodies on multiple fronts for maintaining the quality and safety of food, and thus firms are pressurized to explore BLCT adoption to improve compliance with regulations. As blockchain can trace the product throughout ASC and provide authentic information on food items (Ghadge & Bourlakis, 2021 ; Casino et al, 2020 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Antecedents for blockchain technology-enabled sustainable agriculture supply chain

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Blockchain can solve the problems that the agriculture supply chain (ASC) is facing to achieve sustainable growth. In a nation like India, blockchain application in the supply chain is still new; therefore, supply chain players need a better understanding and awareness of blockchain through valuable insights. This article aims to study the mediating role of blockchain technology adoption (BLCT) for sustainable supply chain performance (SSCP). This study investigates the influence of numerous factors such as green and lean practices, supply chain integration, supply chain risk, performance expectancy, top management support, cost, internal and external environmental conditions, regulatory support, and innovation capability on BLCT adoption. A sample of 316 respondents from Indian ASC industries was collected, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was used. This study's outcomes show that green and lean practices, supply chain integration, supply chain risks, internal and external conditions, regulatory support, innovation capability, and cost positively influence BLCT adoption. Moreover, BLCT positively influences sustainable agriculture supply chain performance. This article is valuable for policymakers, managers, service providers, researchers, and academicians to understand the role of factors in influencing BLCT and BLCT's role in improving sustainable supply chain performance (SSCP).

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Antecedents for blockchain technology-enabled sustainable agriculture supply chain

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To maintain the quality and achieve the transparent result, we followed the process to conduct an SLR suggested by Denyer and Tranfield (2009) and Briner and Denyer (2012) with PRISMA framework (Moher et al, 2010). The steps for conducting SLR in our study are similar to the previous study done in the field of blockchain and other technologies (Vu et al, 2021;Gimenez-Aguilar et al, 2021;Abdirad and Krishnan, 2020;Tandon et al, 2020;Casino et al, 2019;Friday et al, 2018;Prakash et al, 2017;Soni and Kodali, 2011). The process involves five steps to conduct SLR:…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These theories have been used by various researchers in their study to adopt blockchain technology: UTAUT (Tran and Nguyen, 2020; Queiroz and Fosso Wamba, 2019; Queiroz et al , 2020; Francisco and Swanson, 2018; Caldarelli et al , 2020; Wong et al , 2020b; Arias-Oliva et al , 2019); TAM (Liu and Ye, 2021; Grover et al , 2019; Nuryyev et al , 2020; Palos-Sanchez et al , 2021; Gil-Cordero et al , 2020); technology–organization–environment (TOE) framework (Clohessy and Acton, 2019; Gökalp et al , 2020; Wong et al , 2020a; Orji et al , 2020; Vergouwen et al , 2020; Malik et al , 2021); TAM with TRI (Sohaib et al , 2020); TAM with diffusion of innovation (DOI) theory (Ullah et al , 2021; Lou and Li, 2017); TAM with TTF (Lian et al , 2020); TAM with TRI and TPB (Kamble et al , 2019); and UTAUT with TTF and ISS models (Alazab et al , 2021).…”

Section: Theoretical Background Of Adoption Theoriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blockchain technology adoption in government organizations: a systematic literature review

Falwadiya

Dhingra

2022

JGOSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Blockchain technology is spreading its roots and growing rapidly. With the advancement of blockchain technology, government organizations are focusing toward adopting blockchain technology. The purpose of this study is to identify the factors that affect the adoption of blockchain technology and provide a conceptual framework to adopt blockchain technology in government organizations. Design/methodology/approach To answer the research questions, this study has used systematic literature review (SLR). For achieving the quality and transparent process, this study has applied the PRISMA framework in the SLR. Findings With the help of SLR, this study has identified 72 factors that influence the adoption of blockchain technology. After critically examining the factors, this study has developed the conceptual framework for the adoption of blockchain technology in government organizations with four factors of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model and four additional factors, i.e. facilitating conditions, social influence, effort expectancy, performance expectancy, trust, transparency, cost and security. Research limitations/implications To perform SLR, this study has used two databases: Web of Science and Google Scholar; future studies can consider other databases. This study has provided the framework but not validated it; future studies can use structural equation modeling and artificial neural network to validate the framework. Practical implications This study helps to provide insights about blockchain technology and help government and policymakers to take decisions for the adoption of blockchain technology and in determining the future action plan. Originality/value Few studies are available in the literature that have used SLR to identify blockchain technology adoption in government organizations.

show abstract

“…Vu et al [89] classify blockchain adoption by a firm into three stages: initiation, adoption, and implementation. The level of impact created by the blockchain varies for different stages of adoption by a firm [90] .…”

Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

White knight in dark days? Supply chain finance firms, blockchain, and the COVID-19 pandemic

Paul¹,

Adhikari²,

Bose³

2022

Information & Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Blockchain adoption in food supply chains: a review and implementation framework

Cited by 109 publications

References 97 publications

Antecedents for blockchain technology-enabled sustainable agriculture supply chain

Antecedents for blockchain technology-enabled sustainable agriculture supply chain

Blockchain technology adoption in government organizations: a systematic literature review

White knight in dark days? Supply chain finance firms, blockchain, and the COVID-19 pandemic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About