2011
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blink Frequency and Duration during Perimetry and Their Relationship to Test–Retest Threshold Variability

Abstract: A wide range of blink frequencies was observed during perimetric testing. Although no blink parameters showed significant influence on threshold variability, when the blinks overlapped with a stimulus presentation, the probability of seeing was reduced. For suprathreshold stimuli, blinks often occurred after the presentation, whereas for subthreshold presentations, there was no relationship to presentation time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the GT parameters analyzed in the current study, move 3-5 , move >6 , TFF, and BF were significantly associated with low MD values, probably because the patient was not well-fixated and could not see the target stimulus during blinking, as suggested in a previous report. 20 On the other hand, move 1-2 was not significantly related with MD values. This is unsurprising given the 68 spacing of VF test points in the 30-2 VF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Among the GT parameters analyzed in the current study, move 3-5 , move >6 , TFF, and BF were significantly associated with low MD values, probably because the patient was not well-fixated and could not see the target stimulus during blinking, as suggested in a previous report. 20 On the other hand, move 1-2 was not significantly related with MD values. This is unsurprising given the 68 spacing of VF test points in the 30-2 VF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Furthermore, a previous study has reported that eye movements of less than 38 are commonly observed in VF tests, even in well-trained healthy observers. 28,29 Surprisingly, move 3-5 had a larger coefficient than move ‡6 in the optimum formula. The reason for this is not clear, but we hypothesize that move 3-5 mainly reflects misfixations during the VF measurement whereas move ‡6 could be a result of a lack of concentration during the VF test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[13] In perimeters without auto-tracking, such as the HFA, small (less than 3°) eye movements during the VF measurement cannot be avoided, even in well-trained healthy subjects. [16, 17] Thus, the Goldmann size III stimulus (with a diameter of 0.43 degrees) is projected onto the retina anywhere within at least 3 degrees of the designed location. This phenomenon is not observed with the MP-3, because its stimulus is projected onto a particular position of the retina, adjusted for eye movements according to perimeter’s auto-tracking function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%