2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blinded by an error

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
63
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
63
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If errors lead to adaptive processes (like PES) that aim to prevent future errors, error rates should be decreased on trials immediately following errors. While some studies indeed find such a reduction (Danielmeier et al, 2011; Laming, 1968; Marco-Pallares et al, 2008), others find an increase in error rate after errors (Fiehler et al, 2005; Houtman and Notebaert, 2013; Rabbitt and Rodgers, 1977). The standard model of error-related cognitive control has been unable to account for these findings.…”
Section: Global Interruption: Adaptive or Maladaptive?mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If errors lead to adaptive processes (like PES) that aim to prevent future errors, error rates should be decreased on trials immediately following errors. While some studies indeed find such a reduction (Danielmeier et al, 2011; Laming, 1968; Marco-Pallares et al, 2008), others find an increase in error rate after errors (Fiehler et al, 2005; Houtman and Notebaert, 2013; Rabbitt and Rodgers, 1977). The standard model of error-related cognitive control has been unable to account for these findings.…”
Section: Global Interruption: Adaptive or Maladaptive?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Accordingly, subjects also show impaired cognitive performance after unexpected events in the laboratory. For example, target detection is impaired following both unexpected perceptual events (Schroger, 1996) and errors (Houtman and Notebaert, 2013). While there are several theories about why such distraction occurs (most of which revolve around a relatively non-specific shift of attention that happens after surprise Notebaert et al, 2009) we recently tested the new idea that such distraction arises (at least partially) from the broad suppressive effect induced by unexpected events.…”
Section: Unexpected Events May Affect Cognition Via the Stopping Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reflects a strategic increase in control aimed at reducing the probability of an error (for a discussion, see Houtman and Notebaert, 2013). Because the literature indicates that post-error behavioral adjustments correspond to an increase in the reaction times (RTs) and to an increase, or (more often) to a non-decrease, in accuracy, then in general error reactivity is understood as an increase in response caution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers successfully replicated the red effect by using additional chromatic controls and cognitive tasks (e.g., verbal reasoning, working memory, attentional interference, detection, creativity, and language proficiency; Buiks, 2013;Gnambs, Appel, & Batinic, 2010;Houtman & Notebaert, 2013;Hulshof, 2013;Ioan et al, 2007;Jung, Kim, & Han, 2011;Maier et al, 2008, Thorstenson, submitted;Yamazaki & Eto, 2011). Also within a Chinese sample, red has been shown to undermine the intellectual performance of students (Shi, Zhang, & Jiang, in press).…”
Section: Color In the Achievement Context In Humans 12mentioning
confidence: 98%