2011
DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2011.607320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blended learning: communication, locations and work-life practices

Abstract: The article discusses blended learning and how various delivery formats affect the way learning is situated in work-life practices. The authors approached this issue through an empirical study of an in-service training programme for middle-level managers in a number of case organisations. The programme used a combination of e-learning, textbooks and face-to-face seminars. The conclusion reached is that a purposeful blend of delivery modes and technology systems can situate learning outside the daily work locat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the face-to-face mode, with its high affordance of discussion, role play and interpersonal interaction, showed not only human connection and spontaneity as strengths, but also depth of reflection (one of the strengths of online discussion), thus, to some degree making up for the absence of human interaction in the online mode. This balance of strengths between the face-to-face and online modes is similar to the conclusion that Moe and Rye (2011, p. 177) make from a blended learning case study of managers, that “blended learning has to be approached in a relational way, where the strength and weakness of one component are manifest through its relation to other components.” This was the case in the BWL program in this study, with the online and face-to-face components seen to be complementary in fostering engagement beyond what would have been achieved by either of the individual components in isolation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…However, the face-to-face mode, with its high affordance of discussion, role play and interpersonal interaction, showed not only human connection and spontaneity as strengths, but also depth of reflection (one of the strengths of online discussion), thus, to some degree making up for the absence of human interaction in the online mode. This balance of strengths between the face-to-face and online modes is similar to the conclusion that Moe and Rye (2011, p. 177) make from a blended learning case study of managers, that “blended learning has to be approached in a relational way, where the strength and weakness of one component are manifest through its relation to other components.” This was the case in the BWL program in this study, with the online and face-to-face components seen to be complementary in fostering engagement beyond what would have been achieved by either of the individual components in isolation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%