2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blast induced fracture modelling using smoothed particle hydrodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al [23] established the numerical model of projectiles impacting the concrete targets using the SPH method and studied the dynamic failure of concrete. Saba et al [24] simulated the failure process of granite under blasting based on the SPH method and analyzed the failure characteristics and expansion of cracks. Above numerical simulation studies provide the technical reference for establishing the numerical model of water jet impacting SFRC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [23] established the numerical model of projectiles impacting the concrete targets using the SPH method and studied the dynamic failure of concrete. Saba et al [24] simulated the failure process of granite under blasting based on the SPH method and analyzed the failure characteristics and expansion of cracks. Above numerical simulation studies provide the technical reference for establishing the numerical model of water jet impacting SFRC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there has been limited investigations on the effect of blast-induced fractures on the permeability of rocks. Various methods such as theoretical analysis (Li and Xue, 2000; Guo et al , 2014; Li et al , 2018; Li et al , 2018; Hou et al , 2019), experimental works (Moody, 1978; Butkovich et al , 1979; McHugh and Keough, 1982; Cunderman and Northrop, 1986; Zhu et al , 2016; Yang et al , 2019; Venkatesh et al , 2019) and numerical studies (Carter, 1978; Grady et al , 1980; Adams et al , 1981; Zhu et al , 2013; Jordan et al , 2015; Ye et al , 2017; Yuan et al , 2018; Gharehdash, 2019; Gharehdash et al , 2020) have been suggested to consider the permeability improvement using blast fracturing. Each of these approaches has been discussed in detail following.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, limited computational studies have addressed the hydraulic behavior of blast-induced fractures. Advances in this field have come from experiments associated with the permeability of rocks (Carter, 1978; Grady et al , 1980; Adams et al , 1981; Zhu et al , 2013; Jordan et al , 2015; Ye et al , 2017; Yuan et al , 2018; Gharehdash, 2019; Gharehdash et al , 2020). Therefore, it is desirable to determine a validated computational method for predicting topology and permeability of blast-induced fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesh-based methods can be effectively used but must consider additional factors when dealing with large deformation in the model, e.g., regularization, erosion criteria, softening, and remeshing [24][25][26]. The problem of significant element distortion can be omitted by using different methods, e.g., the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) formulation [15,18,27], discrete element method (DEM) [28,29] or mesh-free methods like smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) [23,30]. It is also possible to couple different techniques; such an approach has proved efficient and reliable in the case of blast-induced brittle fracture [17,23,28], as well as other engineering problems [31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%