1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-3796(98)00228-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blanket diagnostics system for ITER

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ref. 33, measurements of the E.-N. effect in Alumel up to 0.35 T are shown and it was mentioned that the induced error ͑due to E.-N. effect͒ tends to saturate above 0.3 T and also that the induced error remained constant in the range 0.5 to 2.5 T but no data were shown to support this claim. It is true that the intrinsic magnetic induction B i will saturate but the total magnetic induction B will nevertheless increase further at higher magnetic field strengths.…”
Section: Eϭqٌtϫb ͑3͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. 33, measurements of the E.-N. effect in Alumel up to 0.35 T are shown and it was mentioned that the induced error ͑due to E.-N. effect͒ tends to saturate above 0.3 T and also that the induced error remained constant in the range 0.5 to 2.5 T but no data were shown to support this claim. It is true that the intrinsic magnetic induction B i will saturate but the total magnetic induction B will nevertheless increase further at higher magnetic field strengths.…”
Section: Eϭqٌtϫb ͑3͒mentioning
confidence: 99%