2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000157688.41223.d2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bladder Neck Sling for Treatment of Neurogenic Incontinence in Children With Augmentation Cystoplasty: Long-Term Followup

Abstract: We consider bladder neck slings the procedure of choice for the enhancement of bladder outlet resistance in the majority of patients with neurogenic bladder who need augmentation cystoplasty and whom we do not expect will be capable of voiding spontaneously. In males and females satisfactory long-term continence can be expected with the use of the rectus fascial sling.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent urethral and bladder neck damage could explain the frequency of mixed urinary incontinence, low MUP or the opening bladder neck we observed. As recently reported by Castellan et al, 20 we associated a bladder neck fascial sling to prevent the persistence of the stress component of urinary incontinence through the native urethra. Despite this procedure, three patients required additional treatment for persistent stress urinary incontinence by the native urethra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequent urethral and bladder neck damage could explain the frequency of mixed urinary incontinence, low MUP or the opening bladder neck we observed. As recently reported by Castellan et al, 20 we associated a bladder neck fascial sling to prevent the persistence of the stress component of urinary incontinence through the native urethra. Despite this procedure, three patients required additional treatment for persistent stress urinary incontinence by the native urethra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Interestingly, they had the lowest preoperative MUP of the series and 2/3 had an opened bladder neck. Castellan et al 20 also reported seven patients with mixed neurogenic incontinence that failed after bladder neck sling associated with bladder augmentation. Continence of native urethra remains a challenging situation in female para-or quadriplegic patients, especially with a long-standing indwelling catheter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After an average of 4.2 years, 51 of 58 patients had achieved continence after a rectus fascia BNS (87). Small intestinal submucosal bladder neck slings achieve satisfactory rates of continence (>75%) at a mean of 15 months follow up in 14/18 females and 75% of non-ambulatory males who underwent concomitant bladder augmentation and catheterizable channel.…”
Section: Bladder Neck Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is more difficult to determine the relative contribution of the above factors in persistently incontinent patients with NB. The parameters used presently to indicate low outlet resistance include a DLPP of < 30-40 cmH 2 O, a Valsalva leak-point pressure of < 100 cmH 2 O, lack of electromyographic activity in the striated sphincter, presence of an open BN at low filling pressures in an erect position, and a clinical history suggestive of stress UI [3,[5][6][7][8][11][12][13]. These preoperative parameters are often used in combination to assess the outlet resistance, since individually; they sometimes lack reproducibility in young children and often do not correlate with the outcome of surgical intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite an aggressive protocol of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and anticholinergics, 10-20% of children with neurogenic bladders (NB) will eventually require surgical intervention to achieve socially acceptable dryness [1]. Reports on surgical procedures for incontinent patients with NB show a high rate of concomitant augmentation cystoplasty (AC) with bladder neck procedures (BOP) [2][3][4][5]. The implication is that a combination of poor outlet resistance and abnormal bladder storage characteristics is responsible for the urinary incontinence (UI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%