2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blackwater treatment using vertical greening: Efficiency and microbial community structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The removal efficiency significantly increased over time from 4.7% to 82.3% (| S | = 32), possibly due to a decreasing rate of release from the filter medium, an increase in temperature, and/or progressive biofilm growth. , This trend agrees with the literature findings where after an establishing phase COD removal performances increased up to 86% . On average, this study found 40.4% COD removal efficiency in GW columns (102.67 mg/h average removal rate), similar to the range of 46.0–49.3% in ref but lower than the values of 92.4% in ref , in which sampling started after 16 weeks, and 95% in ref . These results indicate a good efficiency for the removal of COD from GW, within the range observed in laboratory studies of green walls.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The removal efficiency significantly increased over time from 4.7% to 82.3% (| S | = 32), possibly due to a decreasing rate of release from the filter medium, an increase in temperature, and/or progressive biofilm growth. , This trend agrees with the literature findings where after an establishing phase COD removal performances increased up to 86% . On average, this study found 40.4% COD removal efficiency in GW columns (102.67 mg/h average removal rate), similar to the range of 46.0–49.3% in ref but lower than the values of 92.4% in ref , in which sampling started after 16 weeks, and 95% in ref . These results indicate a good efficiency for the removal of COD from GW, within the range observed in laboratory studies of green walls.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…9 The average output concentration (2.74 ± 0.25 mg/L) and removal efficiencies (−22% to 56.7%) are consistent with previous studies (1−2.6 mg/L and 35−72.6%, respectively, on average). 20,22,26,38 The E. coli average removal efficiency (Figure 7a) was excellent (98.9 ± 1.8% and 2.74 ± 1.55 log units) and significantly improved over time (|S| = 20), ensuring a very low average concentration in the output (25 MPN/100 mL) compared to that of another vegetated pot system with values of 2.72 × 10 3 MPN/100 mL 26 or 0.3−0.6 log unit. 23 Hence, a single modular panel reduced the E. coli concentration by ≤4 orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the coverage values of all sequences were 98.88%–99.60% (Table 1), demonstrating that the sequencing results adequately represented the microbial composition of the samples (Jin et al, 2017). The total number of observed OTUs in the initial sludge sample was 1185, which was considerably larger than that of E1 to E4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Thus, blackwater treatment is recommended in order to avoid potential environmental and human health risks (Larsen et al, 2009). Some of the most common blackwater treatments used nowadays include aerobic and anaerobic biological processes and membrane bioreactors, among others (Chaggu et al, 2007;Luostarinen et al, 2007;Murat Hocaoglu et al, 2011;Jin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%