Purpose: To compare T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging with AASPIR (asymmetric adiabatic spectral inversion recovery) and STIR (short T1 inversion recovery) for myocardial signal intensity, image quality, and fat suppression.Materials and Methods: Forty consecutive patients (47 6 16 years old) referred by cardiologists for CMR-based myocardial tissue characterization were scanned with both STIR and AASPIR T2-weighted imaging approaches. Signal intensity of left ventricular myocardium was normalized to a region of interest generating a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In six patients with regional edema on STIR the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was assessed. Two independent observers used a scoring system to evaluate image quality and artifact suppression. Six healthy volunteers (three males, 32 6 7 years) were recruited to compare fat suppression between AASPIR and STIR.Results: SNR of AASPIR was greater than STIR for basal (128 6 44 vs. 83 6 40, P < 0.001), mid-(144 6 65 vs. 96 6 39, P < 0.01), and apical (145 6 59 vs. 105 6 35, P < 0.05) myocardium. Improved image quality and greater suppression of artifacts was demonstrated with AASPIR. In patients with regional edema, CNR increased by 49% with AASPIR, while SNR of pericardial fat did not differ (44 6 39 vs. 33 6 30, P > 0.05).
Conclusion:Our findings support the implementation of an AASPIR-based approach for T2-weighted imaging due to improved pericardial fat suppression, image quality, and artifact suppression with greater CNR and SNR.