1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1991.tb00235.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bivariate Correlation with Spatial Data

Abstract: The standard hypothesis testing procedures for parametric and nonparametric tests of association assume that the pairs of observations are independent. A parametric test such as for the significance of the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient further assumes the observations are drawn from the same, approximately bivariate normal, distribution with constant expected value (mean) and finite variance.A statistically significant test of association does not necessarily indicate a causal link between X a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the data had a non-normal distribution, we computed Spearman correlations. When spatial autocorrelation exists, the degrees of freedom in the conventional correlation tests of the significance may be incorrect, which can lead to misestimation of significance of effects [47][48][49] because spatial autocorrelation is a violation of the independence assumption. If necessary, we used the Clifford and Richardson adjustment method to account for spatial autocorrelation in the Spearman correlation coefficients, with six spatial lags used in generating correlation matrices based on the row-standardized first-order Queen contiguity weights matrix.…”
Section: Spatial Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the data had a non-normal distribution, we computed Spearman correlations. When spatial autocorrelation exists, the degrees of freedom in the conventional correlation tests of the significance may be incorrect, which can lead to misestimation of significance of effects [47][48][49] because spatial autocorrelation is a violation of the independence assumption. If necessary, we used the Clifford and Richardson adjustment method to account for spatial autocorrelation in the Spearman correlation coefficients, with six spatial lags used in generating correlation matrices based on the row-standardized first-order Queen contiguity weights matrix.…”
Section: Spatial Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If necessary, we used the Clifford and Richardson adjustment method to account for spatial autocorrelation in the Spearman correlation coefficients, with six spatial lags used in generating correlation matrices based on the row-standardized first-order Queen contiguity weights matrix. 47,49 The sample size is adjusted, when using the Clifford and Richardson methodology, to account for the spatial dependence between observations. Based on the adjusted sample size, the corresponding t statistics and p values change.…”
Section: Spatial Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for possible spatial dependence in both x and y a modified version of the t-test (Clifford et al, 1989) was used, which estimates the (reduced) effective sample size for spatially autocorrelated processes. The test of Clifford et al (1989) was initially developed for Pearson's correlation coefficient, but has been shown also to be valid for Spearman's ρ (Haining, 1991). The effective sample size m eff is estimated, following the notation of Dale and Fortin (2009), as…”
Section: Catchment Characteristics and Climatic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used bivariate spatial association analysis or spatial correspondence analysis (Haining, 1991) to measure relations between the intensity of TB clusters and their distances to the four types of transport infrastructures (i.e. provincial roads, national roads, highways, and railways) at the same scales as stage 1.…”
Section: Stagementioning
confidence: 99%