Proceedings of ISCAS'95 - International Symposium on Circuits and Systems
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.1995.523814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bit-serial dual basis systolic multipliers for GF(2/sup m/)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 depicts comparing results of the proposed multiplier in Fig. 3 and bit-parallel systolic multipliers in [6,9]. Both related multipliers have the same hardware requirements, latencies, computation times, and unidirectional data flow.…”
Section: Bit-parallel Systolic Multiplier Over Gf(2 M )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 depicts comparing results of the proposed multiplier in Fig. 3 and bit-parallel systolic multipliers in [6,9]. Both related multipliers have the same hardware requirements, latencies, computation times, and unidirectional data flow.…”
Section: Bit-parallel Systolic Multiplier Over Gf(2 M )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the polynomial basis, it is difficult to compute an inverse using the multiply-square algorithm since the number of multiplication is too great. A dual basis multiplier in [9] for each multiply-square computations needs extra logical operations to perform the basis conversion. The proposed bit-parallel systolic multiplier has low-complexity architecture as compared with two related multipliers.…”
Section: Bit-parallel Systolic Multiplier Over Gf(2 M )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore since each basic cell is only connected with its neighboring cells, signals can be propagated at a high clock speed. There are systolic multipliers using a polynomial basis [7,8,10,11,12,13,15] and a dual basis [9]. A bit parallel systolic multiplier in [8] has a comparable or better longest path delay than the multipliers in [7,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%