2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-015-0087-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bispectral index-guided general anaesthesia in combination with interscalene block reduces desflurane consumption in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a clinical comparison of bupivacaine versus levobupivacaine

Abstract: BackgroundThe goal of this study was to compare the influence of an interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) performed with either bupivacaine or levobupivacaine in conjunction with general anaesthesia (GA) on desflurane consumption, which was titrated to maintain the recovery profiles and postoperative analgesia while also keeping the bispectral index score (BIS) between 40 and 60 in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery.MethodsSixty patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery were prospecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this continuous infusion, we did not see significant difference in HR and MBP between the two groups, which indicated a stable anesthesia statement. BIS value has been widely accepted and well used as an index of sedation measurement in different kinds of sedative and anesthesia techniques, 23 , 24 and it was significantly correlated with commonly used subjective clinical scales, 23 for example, the Ramsay sedation scale we used in this study. Interestingly, we observed significant lower BIS values in the PRD group during anesthesia, and higher sedation score right after extubation, which was consistent with the previous studies and indicates that intraoperative DEX provided a more stable anesthesia, without changing the hemodynamic characters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Using this continuous infusion, we did not see significant difference in HR and MBP between the two groups, which indicated a stable anesthesia statement. BIS value has been widely accepted and well used as an index of sedation measurement in different kinds of sedative and anesthesia techniques, 23 , 24 and it was significantly correlated with commonly used subjective clinical scales, 23 for example, the Ramsay sedation scale we used in this study. Interestingly, we observed significant lower BIS values in the PRD group during anesthesia, and higher sedation score right after extubation, which was consistent with the previous studies and indicates that intraoperative DEX provided a more stable anesthesia, without changing the hemodynamic characters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…GA are not as pronounced as those of ISBPB alone. This is likely because of the adverse effects associated with GA. Less GA is required when an ISBPB is already active, 17,19 but there may still be some GAassociated adverse effects that can counteract the beneficial effects associated with ISBPB Only. This is supported by the fact that patients in the ISBPB Only group were discharged from the PACU almost 45 min earlier than those in the GA Only group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our meta-analysis of HR-responses over time considered two sub-groups based on the type of anaesthesia and maintenance agents used. BL-HR was reported in 48 SGs ( n = 1334); 12 used TIVA-propofol[ 16 33 34 35 36 37 ] (73.7 ± 13.4 beats/min, n = 451), 33 received inhaled anaesthetics[ 16 29 35 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 ] (73.6 ± 13.6 beats/min, n = 744) and 139 subjects had ISB. [ 6 50 ] MDs between HR-values at supine (Pre-BCP) and post-BCP status are depicted in Figure 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity analysis revealed that various anaesthetic agents significantly influenced fall in HRs. However, it made little difference to the overall results when study controls[ 29 30 33 34 35 37 39 40 41 42 43 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 ] and randomised trials[ 4 6 12 13 15 16 26 27 28 29 30 33 34 35 37 38 39 41 42 44 45 46 47 50 55 60 61 64 ] were analysed separately [ Table 2 ]. Meta-regression was performed since primary outcomes, characterised by significant heterogeneity, yielded statistically significant omnibus P values for statistical models considering different maintenance agents and opioids.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%