2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-010-0915-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bispectral index correlates well with Richmond agitation sedation scale in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients

Abstract: Our results illustrate that BIS correlates well with RASS when assessing the level of sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. BIS reliably differentiates inadequate from adequate sedation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The BIS is an objective indicator in assessing brain arousal and it is used in sedation assessment of mechanical ventilation as well as general anesthesia. BIS is reported to be correlated to other sedation indicators19,20. This study was able to verify significant correlation among sedation indicators and BIS exhibited significant results as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The BIS is an objective indicator in assessing brain arousal and it is used in sedation assessment of mechanical ventilation as well as general anesthesia. BIS is reported to be correlated to other sedation indicators19,20. This study was able to verify significant correlation among sedation indicators and BIS exhibited significant results as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In ICU, BIS use remains controversial because of the high level of variability of this parameter as described in our study (Figure 4), which led us to study the variation of this rather isolated value. Some authors have concluded that the most recent version of BIS—BIS XP—is useful in the ICU setting for assessing sedation [23], whereas others do not share this view [24]. The use of BIS monitoring to assess pain in our study could be criticized, but it was shown to be sensitive to nociceptive stimuli in critically ill, sedated patients [6,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…BİS değerlendirme-si daha objektif bir yöntem olmasına ve BİS değer-lendirmeleri ile RASS değerlendirmeleri korele bulunmuştur. NIMV uygulanan hastalarda "bilinçli sedasyon" hedeflendiğinden BİS kullanımı yerine RASS değerlendirmesi maliyet açısından daha uygun olacaktır (19,20). Sedasyonun daha derin yapılması gerekli ise BİS ile hastaların takibi uygundur.…”
Section: Bi̇s Düzeyiunclassified