2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70465-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bisecting Lines with Different Tools in Right Brain Damaged Patients: The Role of Action Programming and Sensory Feedback in Modulating Spatial Remapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It appeared likely that the stick determined an extension of body representation, including in the peripersonal space all the space reachable by the tool so remapping far as near space. These data, together with more recent findings by NeppiMòdona et al [28], suggest that space representations can be recoded when tools change the spatial relation between the agent's body and the target object.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…It appeared likely that the stick determined an extension of body representation, including in the peripersonal space all the space reachable by the tool so remapping far as near space. These data, together with more recent findings by NeppiMòdona et al [28], suggest that space representations can be recoded when tools change the spatial relation between the agent's body and the target object.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In far space the target line was located 3 m from the patient’s feet and the patient bisected the line by means of a laser pointer. The two conditions reaching in near space and pointing in far space were considered the “baseline” conditions to reveal the presence of dissociations between neglect in near and in far space (see Berti and Frassinetti, 2000; Pegna et al, 2001; Neppi-Mòdona et al, 2007). When using a stick to bisect a segment located in near space or a laser pointer to bisect a segment located in far space, patients do not remap near space into far space or far space into near space, respectively; instead, when using a laser pointer to bisect a segment located in near space, an object-dependent far space representation can be activated (a laser pointer is often associated to actions carried out in far space); similarly, when using a stick to bisect a segment located in fare space, a near space representation can be activated (the stick activates a near space representation because the far object, once reached with the stick, is automatically recoded as being located in proximal space as a consequence of tool use).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, near and far space representations were found to be dynamic, rather than static. Neurophysiological (Iriki et al, 1996) and neuropsychological studies (Berti and Frassinetti, 2000; Berti et al, 2002; Neppi-Mòdona et al, 2007) have shown that far space can me remapped as near, and near space as far, depending on the tool/action used by the patient to reach objects located in near and far space, respectively. Furthermore, among the functions that can be impaired in neglect there is walking, with patients showing a lateral deviation of the walking trajectory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the procedures aimed at finding dissociation between spatial frames of reference had not reached a standard procedure or yielded specific normative values for use in a clinical neuropsychological setting. One of these tests was the distal line bisection (dLB) in which the patient was required to bisect distal lines in extra-personal space using a laser pointer [8,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%