Birth prevalence of congenital anomalies in the City of Buenos Aires, Argentina, according to socioeconomic level

Abstract

The goal of our study is to describe the prevalence of congenital anomalies (CA) in hospitals of the City of Buenos Aires, Argentina, according to two proxy variables of the socioeconomic level: health subsector, public (PUB) versus private/social security (PRI), and geographical location, northern (N) versus southern (S). The source of data was the National Network of Congenital Anomalies of Argentina (RENAC) (period 2010-2016). From a total of 228,208 births, 4872 newborns with CA were detected (2.14%). The prevalence in PRI-N, PUB-N, PRI-S, and PUBS hospitals were 1.59%, 1.91%, 2.20%, and 2.43%, respectively. Prevalence of neural tube defects, abdominal wall defects, and oral clefts was significantly higher in PUB than in PRI hospitals. Prevalence of critical heart defects was significantly lower in PUB-N and in PRI-S hospitals. Prevalence of anencephaly, encephalocele, hydrocephalus, microcephaly, gastroschisis, cleft lip and palate, ductus arteriosus, and bilateral renal agenesis was higher in PUB hospitals, both N and S, as well as microphthalmia/anophthalmia and ambiguous genitalia, spina bifida, anotia/microtia, postaxial polydactyly, and diaphragmatic hernia had higher prevalences in PUBS hospitals. Omphalocele was more frequent in PUB-N hospitals. Results suggest that vulnerable populations in the public and southern subsectors of the city still require a greater support to reinforce resources and strategies that lead to greater equity in access to health.

Characterization of Risk Factors for Neural Tube Defects: A Case-Control Study in Bogota and Cali, Colombia, 2001-2018

“…This classification is based on the housing infrastructure characteristics, access to public services, including transport and basic resources such as drinking water, electricity, gas, and sewage. Similar results were found in a study conducted in Buenos Aires, Argentina, 40 with an increased incidence of neural tube defects in public hospitals in geographic areas with low socioeconomic stratification.…”

“…Although the findings of this study could be attributed to numerous causes such as access to health resources, schooling, unmet basic needs, and maternal malnutrition, the indexes of environmental pollutants and particulate matter 40 should also be taken into account. These environmental factors should be considered as land is generally more affordable near industrial areas, airports, polluted rivers, or landfills.…”

Causes of Microcephaly in the Zika Era in Argentina: A Retrospective Study

“…Such understanding is important, considering that the prevalence of congenital microcephaly in Buenos Aires was estimated to be 1.8 per 10 000 (95% CI 1.3, 2.5) in 2010 to 2016. 35 Microcephaly, particularly where it is accompanied by additional clinical features, can have serious implications for growth and development, with affected children at significant risk for delay across all aspects of development and for long-term disability. 21 This study is limited by the retrospective design, with some missing data and loss to follow-up of a small number of cases.…”

Spatial analysis of birth defects in Brazil based on the human development index (HDI): an ecological study

“…An analysis from 2004 to 2015, relating social and health policies, like the Bolsa Família Program, comprehends that fertility rates, per capita income, access to health professionals and good prenatal care are factors that interfere with the IMR; incomes that are less than 2 minimum wages are associated with higher risks of IMR in Brazil (Bugelli et al 2021). The study by Bronberg et al (2020) already pointed out that low socioeconomic levels are a risk for BDs.…”