2010
DOI: 10.1002/syn.20832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biplexiform ganglion cells contact photoreceptors in the retina of the greenling Hexagrammos octogrammus

Abstract: The biplexiform cell (bpxRGC) is a relatively and recently discovered type of retinal ganglion cells. Like "ordinary" ganglion cells, bpxRGCs have dendrites arborizing within the inner plexiform layer. However, as distinct from other ganglion cells, they have dendrites ascending to the outer plexiform layer. To date, bpxRGCs have been found in mammals, amphibians, and teleost fishes (Cook et al. [1996] Vis Neurosci 13:517-528). The mammalian and amphibian bpxRGCs form direct contacts with photoreceptors and ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only prior description of a biplexiform ganglion cell in mammals was based on observations in macaques (Mariani, ; Zrenner et al, ), but others have provided compelling evidence for reinterpreting that type as horizontal cells that have been displaced to the inner retina, perhaps through errors in retinal development (Wassle et al, ). In teleosts, a distinctive biplexiform ganglion cell has been described, with confirmed axon in the optic nerve, and dual dendritic arbors, one in the outermost layer of the IPL and a second in the OPL (Cook et al, ; Pushchin and Kalachev, ), a pattern strikingly similar to that of immature melanopsin ganglion cells with ORDs. Direct contacts between photoreceptors and ganglion‐cell dendrites are the rule rather than the exception in the hagfish, a jawless vertebrate whose primitive retinas apparently lack horizontal, bipolar and amacrine cells (Holmberg, ; Lamb et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only prior description of a biplexiform ganglion cell in mammals was based on observations in macaques (Mariani, ; Zrenner et al, ), but others have provided compelling evidence for reinterpreting that type as horizontal cells that have been displaced to the inner retina, perhaps through errors in retinal development (Wassle et al, ). In teleosts, a distinctive biplexiform ganglion cell has been described, with confirmed axon in the optic nerve, and dual dendritic arbors, one in the outermost layer of the IPL and a second in the OPL (Cook et al, ; Pushchin and Kalachev, ), a pattern strikingly similar to that of immature melanopsin ganglion cells with ORDs. Direct contacts between photoreceptors and ganglion‐cell dendrites are the rule rather than the exception in the hagfish, a jawless vertebrate whose primitive retinas apparently lack horizontal, bipolar and amacrine cells (Holmberg, ; Lamb et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biplexiform retinal ganglion cells in gnathostomes are thought to participate in a tectum‐mediated reflex for rapid visual‐motor responses (Pushchin and Kalachev, ). The dendrites projecting to the outer layers of the retina of these biplexiform retinal ganglion cells have been observed to contact photoreceptors directly in both gnathostomes (Mariani, ; Pushchin and Kalachev, ) and lampreys (De Miguel et al, ; Rio et al, ), suggesting that these cells provide a direct link from photoreceptors to retinal ganglion cells, which may aid in rapid reflex functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimming detectors would be the closest candidates. However, both in fish and other vertebrates, biplexiform cells, along with conventional synapses within the IPL, form direct synapses with photoreceptors (Mariani, ; Straznicky and Gábriel, ; Pushchin and Kalachev, ). Therefore, their RF properties probably differ from those of dimming detectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…form direct synapses with photoreceptors (Mariani, 1982;Straznicky and G abriel, 1995;Pushchin and Kalachev, 2010). Therefore, their RF properties probably differ from those of dimming detectors.…”
Section: Comparison With Physiological Studies and Functional Implicamentioning
confidence: 99%