Biphasic Creep and Stress Relaxation of Articular Cartilage in Compression: Theory and Experiments

Abstract

Articular cartilage is a biphasic material composed of a solid matrix phase ( ~ 20 percent of the total tissue mass by weight) and an interstitial fluid phase (~ 80 percent). The intrinsic mechanical properties of each phase as well as the mechanical interaction between these two phases afford the tissue its interesting rheological behavior. In this investigation, the solid matrix was assumed to be intrinsically incompressible, linearly elastic and nondissipative while the interstitial fluid was assumed to be intrinsically incompressible and nondissipative. Further, it was assumed that the only dissipation comes from the frictional drag of relative motion between the phases. However, more general constitutive equations, including a viscoelastic dissipation of the solid matrix as well as a viscous dissipation of interstitial fluid were also developed. A constant "average" permeability of the tissue was assumed, i.e., independent of deformation, and a solid content function VJVj (the ratio of the volume of each of the phases) was assumed to vary with depth in accordance with the experimentally determined weight ratios. This linear, nonhomogeneous theory was applied to describe the experimentally obtained biphasic creep and biphasic stress relaxation data via a nonlinear regression technique. The determined intrinsic "aggregate" elastic modulus, from ten creep experiments, is 0.70 ± 0.09 MN/m 2 and, from six stress relaxation experiments, is 0.76 ± 0.03 MN/m 2 . The "average" permeability of the tissue is (0.76 ± 0.42) x 10~M m 4 /N's. We concluded that the large spread in the permeability coefficients is due to the assumption of a constant deformation independent permeability. We also concluded that 1) a nonlinearly permeable biphasic model, where the permeability function is given by an experimentally determined empirical law: k = A(p) exp [a(p)e], can be used to describe more accurately the rheological properties of articular cartilage, and 2) the frictional drag of relative motion is the most important factor governing the fluid/solid viscoelastic properties of the tissue in compression.

Topographic Variations in Biomechanical and Biochemical Properties in the Ankle Joint: An In Vitro Bovine Study Evaluating Native and Engineered Cartilage

“…For compressive and shear testing, a creep indentation apparatus was used. 28 Samples were tested as previously described 26 using a semi-analytical, semi-numeric, biphasic model 29 and finite-element optimization. 13 Each sample's aggregate modulus and shear modulus were analyzed.…”

Evaluation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging, biochemical and mechanical properties of trypsin‐treated intervertebral discs under physiological compression loading

“…Swelling pressure was calculated based on the increase in measured force throughout the initial dwell period. Compressive modulus H A and hydraulic permeability k were computed as previously described (29).…”

Microstructured extracellular matrices in tissue engineering and development

“…In the hydrated state, the patterned ECM is treated as a poroelastic material with incompressible fluid and solid constituents, and its deformation is described by biphasic mixture theory. 26,53 Viscous effects that are independent of bulk fluid flow are usually assumed negligible over the time-scales of most experiments. Below, we list the standard governing equations that have been used in computational analysis of microstructured ECM, and highlight recent studies that apply these equations to questions in tissue engineering and development.…”