2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2015.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bipartite coordination problems on networks of multiple mobile agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the multi‐agent system, an agent is called a leader if it does not receive information from other agents, while a follower if it can obtain the information from its neighbours. Lemma 1 The signed graph G s is structurally balanced if and only if there is a diagonal matrix S = diag )(s 1 , s 2 , , s N, where s i = 1 , i V 1 and s i = 1 , i V 2, such that S A S has all non‐negative entries [33, 34]. …”
Section: Preliminaries and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the multi‐agent system, an agent is called a leader if it does not receive information from other agents, while a follower if it can obtain the information from its neighbours. Lemma 1 The signed graph G s is structurally balanced if and only if there is a diagonal matrix S = diag )(s 1 , s 2 , , s N, where s i = 1 , i V 1 and s i = 1 , i V 2, such that S A S has all non‐negative entries [33, 34]. …”
Section: Preliminaries and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 3 For the non‐singular M‐matrix L ¯ 1, there is a positive definite matrix W > 0 [47], such that W L ¯ 1 + L ¯ 1 T W > 0 , where W = diag )(w 1 , w 2 , , w N . Remark 1 Assumptions 1–3 are quite standard assumptions for the problem of bipartite tracking consensus of linear multi‐agent systems with a dynamic leader. Note that, Assumption 1 is standard for the solvability of the bipartite consensus problem of multi‐agent systems, and it is thus reasonable to state it in this paper as in [33–43]. Assumption 2 is commonly used in the literature to guarantee that there exist positive definite matrix solutions to the matrix inequalities (8) and (24), which is further used for feedback gain design.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to consensus control, bipartite consensus control enables all agents to reach a final state with identical magnitude but opposite sign through cooperative and competitive interactions. [6][7][8][9][10] It is an extremely effective control strategy in those scenarios where cooperation and competition coexist among agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cooperative-competitive multiagent systems with high-order agent dynamics, a static state-feedback controller was proposed in the work of Valcher and Misra, 7 and a dynamic output feedback controller was given in the work of Zhang and Chen 20 to guarantee bipartite consensus. A state-feedback controller was designed for a high-order multiagent system with input saturation in the work of Qin et al 21 An iterative learning control algorithm was provided for all agents to reach bipartite consensus on a reference trajectory in the work of Meng et al 9 Adaptive laws of time-varying coupling weights were proposed to solve a sign-consensus problem of linear multiagent systems in the work of Jiang et al 22 Some connectivity conditions were provided for bipartite consensus of discrete-time multiagent systems with switching networks in the work of Meng et al 23 An adaptive control protocol was designed to realize an interventional bipartite consensus for high-order multiagent systems with unknown disturbances in the work of Wu et al 10 Although many advances have been reported on the bipartite consensus problem, some challenging issues remain unresolved. For instance, the existing bipartite consensus strategies generally rely on some global information of the interaction topologies associated with multiagent systems, and thus, they are essentially not fully distributed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%