2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2006.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biosorption of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) onto the cell surface of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microorganisms such as bacteria (Srinath et al 2002), fungi (Bai and Abraham 2003) and algae (Aravindhan et al 2004) have been used in biosorption studies. The bacterium P. aeruginosa (Kang et al 2006) fungus Mucor hiemalis (Tewari et al 2005), yeast Pichia guilliermondi (Kaszycki et al 2004) and microalgae Scenedesmus incrassatulus (Pena-Castro et al 2004) are a few examples of organisms whose metal-binding capacities have been demonstrated. As biosorption of metals using living biomass is timeconsuming and it is expensive to find appropriate biomass, research interest turned to the use of dead microbial biomass and other biomaterials which are of low cost and are abundant.…”
Section: Bacterial Cr(vi) Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microorganisms such as bacteria (Srinath et al 2002), fungi (Bai and Abraham 2003) and algae (Aravindhan et al 2004) have been used in biosorption studies. The bacterium P. aeruginosa (Kang et al 2006) fungus Mucor hiemalis (Tewari et al 2005), yeast Pichia guilliermondi (Kaszycki et al 2004) and microalgae Scenedesmus incrassatulus (Pena-Castro et al 2004) are a few examples of organisms whose metal-binding capacities have been demonstrated. As biosorption of metals using living biomass is timeconsuming and it is expensive to find appropriate biomass, research interest turned to the use of dead microbial biomass and other biomaterials which are of low cost and are abundant.…”
Section: Bacterial Cr(vi) Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their presence in the wastewater of several industrial processes, such as electroplating, metal finishing, metallurgical work, tanning, chemical manufacturing, mining and battery manufacturing, has brought about more environmental concerns due to their toxicity even at low concentrations [2,3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the porous size of the membranes is an important factor in preventing the dissolved metallic ions or the low molecular weight complexes from passing through the membrane (Landaburu-Aguirre et al 2009). The ionic exchange process uses natural or synthetic resins that have the specific capacity to exchange their ions with the heavy metals that are present in the wastewater (Kang et al 2007), but the last ones are commonly preferred due to their ability to eliminate almost all of the metallic ions (Alyüz and Veli 2009). Usually, this technique could be affected by the pH, temperature, initial concentration of the heavy metal and contact time between the substrate and the resin.…”
Section: Removal Techniques For Cr(vi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this material is expensive and can remove only a few milligrams of metallic ions per gram of activated carbon. It is also complicated to regenerate the material for reutilisation (Jusoh et al 2007;Kang et al 2007). Membrane filtration is a promising technique for heavy metal removal, due to its high efficiency, easy operation and space saving aspects.…”
Section: Removal Techniques For Cr(vi)mentioning
confidence: 99%