2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomolecular NMR: a chaperone to drug discovery

Abstract: Biomolecular NMR now contributes routinely to every step in the development of new chemical entities ahead of clinical trials. The versatility of NMR--from detection of ligand binding over a wide range of affinities and a wide range of drug targets with its wealth of molecular information, to metabolomic profiling, both ex vivo and in vivo--has paved the way for broadly distributed applications in academia and the pharmaceutical industry. Proteomics and initial target selection both benefit from NMR: screening… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As this affinity is mainly determined by the interaction between the ligand and the relevant receptor, the study of the relationship between the features of a ligand-protein complex and its binding affinity becomes very important in modern drug discovery. 1,2 Usually, binding affinity of a ligand to a given receptor can be determined by experimental ways, such as NMR spectrometry, [1][2][3] microcalorimetry, [4][5][6] and surface plasmon resonance, 7 but they are often time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, many in silico methods are developed to predict the binding affinity based on the properties of the ligand and the receptor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this affinity is mainly determined by the interaction between the ligand and the relevant receptor, the study of the relationship between the features of a ligand-protein complex and its binding affinity becomes very important in modern drug discovery. 1,2 Usually, binding affinity of a ligand to a given receptor can be determined by experimental ways, such as NMR spectrometry, [1][2][3] microcalorimetry, [4][5][6] and surface plasmon resonance, 7 but they are often time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, many in silico methods are developed to predict the binding affinity based on the properties of the ligand and the receptor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of biophysical methods have evolved for that task, including X-ray crystallography [24,25], surface plasmon resonance (SPR, [26]) and other labelfree biosensor technologies [27], mass spectrometry [28,29], fluorescence correlation spectroscopy [30], thermal shift analysis [31], and NMR spectroscopy (reviewed in a 2003 number of Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, volume 3, number 1; and elsewhere [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]). The use of biophysical methods to detect interactions does not rely on a particular biological assay, which may not be available because of lack of knowledge about the activity of the target or because the activity is simply too complex to develop a simple functional readout (for example, signaling proteins involved in transient protein-protein interactions).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25,26] The recent expansion into the analysis of the metabolome has also enabled NMR to contribute to the clinical validation step. [13,27,28] By far, this stage is the most challenging and expensive component of the drug discovery process, where a significant number of failures occur. [29,30] From the analysis of biofluids, tissues, and cell extracts, NMR can measure changes in the metabolome resulting from the biological activity of the drug lead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%