Biomimetic Scaffolds Modulate the Posttraumatic Inflammatory Response in Articular Cartilage Contributing to Enhanced Neoformation of Cartilaginous Tissue In Vivo
Abstract:Focal chondral lesions of the knee are the most frequent type of trauma in younger patients and are associated with a high risk of developing early posttraumatic osteoarthritis. The only current clinical solutions include microfracture, osteochondral grafting, and autologous chondrocyte implantation. Cartilage tissue engineering based on biomimetic scaffolds has become an appealing strategy to repair cartilage defects. Here, a chondrogenic collagen-chondroitin sulfate scaffold is tested in an orthotopic Lapine… Show more
“…Over the last few decades, researchers and scientists have attempted to fulfil the demands [1] of osteoarthritic patients [2,3] with an articular cartilage scaffold [4,5] equipped with requisite strength [6,7], cell growth factors [8][9][10], and anti-inflammatory properties [11,12]. Unfortunately, they invented biomaterials, such as hydrogels and their derivatives, that were equipped with the carriers of cell growth factors [13] and anti-inflammatory properties [14] but without the requisite strengths [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some finite element and experimental research had been conducted on mechanical strengths, such as tensile and compressive strengths, for scaffold structural support [6,7]. Some in vivo, in vitro, and ex vivo studies [12,19,25,26] had been conducted on cell viability [27] based on the scaffold structure's properties [23]. The harder and softer materials had lower and higher stresses, respectively [28], resulting in the failure of the softer material under higher stress [29].…”
The existing harder biomaterial does not protect the tissue cells with blunt-force trauma effects, making it a poor choice for the articular cartilage scaffold design. Despite the traditional mechanical strengths, this study aims to discover alternative structural strengths for the scaffold supports. The metallic filler polymer reinforced method was used to fabricate the test specimen, either low brass (Cu80Zn20) or titanium dioxide filler, with composition weight percentages (wt.%) of 0, 2, 5, 15, and 30 in polyester urethane adhesive. The specimens were investigated for tensile, flexural, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) tests. The tensile and flexural test results increased with wt.%, but there were higher values for low brass filler specimens. The tensile strength curves were extended to discover an additional tensile strength occurring before 83% wt.%. The higher flexural stress was because of the Cu solvent and Zn solute substituting each other randomly. The FESEM micrograph showed a cubo-octahedron shaped structure that was similar to the AuCu3 structure class. The XRD pattern showed two prominent peaks of 2θ of 42.6° (110) and 49.7° (200) with d-spacings of 1.138 Å and 1.010 Å, respectively, that indicated the typical face-centred cubic superlattice structure with Cu and Zn atoms. Compared to the copper, zinc, and cart brass, the low brass indicated these superlattice structures had ordered–disordered transitional states. As a result, this additional strength was created by the superlattice structure and ordered–disordered transitional states. This innovative strength has the potential to develop into an anti-trauma biomaterial for osteoarthritic patients.
“…Over the last few decades, researchers and scientists have attempted to fulfil the demands [1] of osteoarthritic patients [2,3] with an articular cartilage scaffold [4,5] equipped with requisite strength [6,7], cell growth factors [8][9][10], and anti-inflammatory properties [11,12]. Unfortunately, they invented biomaterials, such as hydrogels and their derivatives, that were equipped with the carriers of cell growth factors [13] and anti-inflammatory properties [14] but without the requisite strengths [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some finite element and experimental research had been conducted on mechanical strengths, such as tensile and compressive strengths, for scaffold structural support [6,7]. Some in vivo, in vitro, and ex vivo studies [12,19,25,26] had been conducted on cell viability [27] based on the scaffold structure's properties [23]. The harder and softer materials had lower and higher stresses, respectively [28], resulting in the failure of the softer material under higher stress [29].…”
The existing harder biomaterial does not protect the tissue cells with blunt-force trauma effects, making it a poor choice for the articular cartilage scaffold design. Despite the traditional mechanical strengths, this study aims to discover alternative structural strengths for the scaffold supports. The metallic filler polymer reinforced method was used to fabricate the test specimen, either low brass (Cu80Zn20) or titanium dioxide filler, with composition weight percentages (wt.%) of 0, 2, 5, 15, and 30 in polyester urethane adhesive. The specimens were investigated for tensile, flexural, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) tests. The tensile and flexural test results increased with wt.%, but there were higher values for low brass filler specimens. The tensile strength curves were extended to discover an additional tensile strength occurring before 83% wt.%. The higher flexural stress was because of the Cu solvent and Zn solute substituting each other randomly. The FESEM micrograph showed a cubo-octahedron shaped structure that was similar to the AuCu3 structure class. The XRD pattern showed two prominent peaks of 2θ of 42.6° (110) and 49.7° (200) with d-spacings of 1.138 Å and 1.010 Å, respectively, that indicated the typical face-centred cubic superlattice structure with Cu and Zn atoms. Compared to the copper, zinc, and cart brass, the low brass indicated these superlattice structures had ordered–disordered transitional states. As a result, this additional strength was created by the superlattice structure and ordered–disordered transitional states. This innovative strength has the potential to develop into an anti-trauma biomaterial for osteoarthritic patients.
“…A 3D ECM-like scaffold structure can be constructed by using cells, scaffold materials, growth factors, etc. It is propitious to recruitment, proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation of chondrocytes and MSCs, thus promoting the repair of damaged cartilage (Bauza-Mayol et al, 2022;Mao et al, 2022;Yang et al, 2022). Among them, SAPHs offer significant advantages and application possibilities.…”
Section: Treatment Of Articular Cartilage Injurymentioning
Due to the lack of blood vessels, nerves and lymphatic vessels, the capacity of articular cartilage to heal is extremely limited. Once damaged, it is urgent for articular cartilage to repair the injury. In recent years, there has been an increase in cartilage tissue engineering studies. Self-assembling peptide hydrogel as a kind of hydrogels composed of peptides and water is widely used in cartilage tissue engineering. Under noncovalent interactions such as electrostatic interaction, hydrophobic interaction, hydrogen bonding and pi-pi stacking force, peptides self-assemble into three-dimensional (3D) structures that mimic the natural extracellular matrix and allow cells to grow, proliferate and differentiate. Because SAPHs have excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability, variable mechanical properties, low immunogenicity, injectability, and the ability to load cells and bioactive substances, many researchers utilized them to promote the repair and regeneration of articular cartilage after damage. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to sum up the composition, injury characteristics, and treatments of articular cartilage, as well as the action of SAPHs in repairing articular cartilage damage.
“…to enhance osteoinduction and support self-healing is an exciting area of research in bone tissue engineering [10][11][12][13][14]. Both cellular and acellular scaffolds are used as templates to support the new tissue formation [15][16][17][18][19]. Tissue scaffolds with biomimetic microarchitectures/mechanics support the adhesion and proliferation of native cells and subsequent formation of the ECM [20][21][22][23][24].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.