2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b00911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomembrane-Modified Field Effect Transistors for Sensitive and Quantitative Detection of Biological Toxins and Pathogens

Abstract: The efforts of detecting bioactive targets with complex, dynamic, and unknown molecular profiles have inspired the development of various biosensor platforms. Herein, we report a cell-membrane-modified field effect transistor (FET) as a function-based nanosensor for the detection and quantitative measurement of numerous toxins and biological samples. By coating carbon nanotube FETs with natural red blood cell membranes, the resulting biomimetic nanosensor can selectively interact with and absorb broad-spectrum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
103
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we used HA to functionalize the surface of hierarchical beads due to the surface hydrophilicity, biocompatibility, and chemical/structural stability. For surface hydrophilicity, the initial HB‐1000/500/150 were hydrophobic due to nanoscale surface roughness trapping nanosized air bubbles3a,15b,20 and the functionalized HHB‐1000/500/150 were hydrophilic due to the abundant carboxy groups (Figure d) retaining water molecules 13a,21. For biocompatibility, the HA‐modified beads showed lower cellular toxicity compared to the pristine hierarchical beads with unmodified surface (Figure S7, Supporting Information), consistent with previous reports 15c,22.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here we used HA to functionalize the surface of hierarchical beads due to the surface hydrophilicity, biocompatibility, and chemical/structural stability. For surface hydrophilicity, the initial HB‐1000/500/150 were hydrophobic due to nanoscale surface roughness trapping nanosized air bubbles3a,15b,20 and the functionalized HHB‐1000/500/150 were hydrophilic due to the abundant carboxy groups (Figure d) retaining water molecules 13a,21. For biocompatibility, the HA‐modified beads showed lower cellular toxicity compared to the pristine hierarchical beads with unmodified surface (Figure S7, Supporting Information), consistent with previous reports 15c,22.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…For surface hydrophilicity, the initial HB‐1000/500/150 were hydrophobic due to nanoscale surface roughness trapping nanosized air bubbles3a,15b,20 and the functionalized HHB‐1000/500/150 were hydrophilic due to the abundant carboxy groups (Figure d) retaining water molecules 13a,21. For biocompatibility, the HA‐modified beads showed lower cellular toxicity compared to the pristine hierarchical beads with unmodified surface (Figure S7, Supporting Information), consistent with previous reports 15c,22. For chemical/structural stability, the HHB‐1000/500/150 were stable in both composition (Figure d) and structure (Figure e) without obvious changes under aqueous solutions which would be ideal for the following cell capture experiments.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The natural solution to this puzzle was to explore the adsorption behavior of polymer and hybrid vesicles as a function of pH. Using vesicles with a range in composition from pure DOPC to pure EO 22 Bd 33 (10,25,50,75, and 100 mol % polymer) we probed the interaction of hybrid vesicles with glass under varying pH conditions (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) by measuring changes in frequency and dissipation (Figure 4). We first compared QCM-D data from hybrid vesicles interacting with glass at pH = 2 to the results obtained at pH = 7 (see above).…”
Section: Behavior Of Lipid Polymer and Hybrid Vesicles Over A Ph Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensors that incorporate biomacromolecules involved in receptor binding or molecular traffic across membranes would be highly tunable and have the potential for sensing with the sensitivity and specificity of biological structures. Indeed, biosensors based on lipid bilayer membranes have demonstrated ways to interrogate membrane-based biochemical processes optically [4], electrically [2,3,5], and acoustically [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%