The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-013-0838-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Model as a Registration Tool for Image-Guided Neurosurgery: Evaluation Against BSpline Registration

Abstract: In this paper we evaluate the accuracy of warping of neuro-images using brain deformation predicted by means of a patient-specific biomechanical model against registration using a BSpline-based free form deformation algorithm. Unlike the Bspline algorithm, biomechanics-based registration does not require an intra-operative MR image which is very expensive and cumbersome to acquire. Only sparse intra-operative data on the brain surface is sufficient to compute deformation for the whole brain. In this contributi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency and effectiveness of this method has been verified through application in the studies on computation of brain deformation for neuroimage registration (Joldes et al, 2009b; Wittek et al, 2010). Although no commonly accepted specific guidelines regarding the required quality of hexahedral meshes in biomechanics are available, several authors have formulated their experience-based recommendations (Ito et al, 2009; Mostayed et al, 2013; Shepherd and Johnson, 2009; Yang and King, 2011). Following Ito et al (2009), Shepherd and Johnson (2009) and Yang and King (2011), we used element Jacobian and warpage to assess mesh quality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The efficiency and effectiveness of this method has been verified through application in the studies on computation of brain deformation for neuroimage registration (Joldes et al, 2009b; Wittek et al, 2010). Although no commonly accepted specific guidelines regarding the required quality of hexahedral meshes in biomechanics are available, several authors have formulated their experience-based recommendations (Ito et al, 2009; Mostayed et al, 2013; Shepherd and Johnson, 2009; Yang and King, 2011). Following Ito et al (2009), Shepherd and Johnson (2009) and Yang and King (2011), we used element Jacobian and warpage to assess mesh quality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ensures plausibility and robustness of the predicted deformations. In particular, patient-specific biomechanical modelling has been successfully used in numerous studies on computing the brain deformations for neuroimage registration (Garlapati et al, 2014; Hu et al, 2007; Ji et al, 2009; Mostayed et al, 2013; Wittek et al, 2010; Xu and Nowinski, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system will create an augmented reality visualisation of the intra-operative configuration of the patient’s brain merged with high resolution pre-operative imaging data, including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and functional MR imaging (fMRI), in order to better localise the tumour and critical healthy tissues. We accomplish this by registering high quality pre-operative neuroimages onto the current, intra-operative configuration of the patient’s brain; however, we do not use an intra-operative image as a target (2, 3)(Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past nonrigid registration of CTs (and other radiographic image modalities) relied solely on image processing methods that predict the deformation field within the human body organs/tissues without taking into account the principles of mechanics governing deformations of such organs/tissues [2,4]. Such methods do not ensure plausibility of the predicted deformations and their accuracy tends to decrease when the differences between the source and target images become large due to articulated motion of the body segments and soft tissue deformations [4][5][6]. Therefore, biomechanical models, in which predicting the organs/tissue deformation is treated as a computational problem of solid mechanics, have been introduced [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%