2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical investigation of two plating systems for medial column fusion in foot

Abstract: BackgroundArthrodesis of the medial column (navicular, cuneiform I and metatarsal I) is performed for reasons such as Charcot arthropathy, arthritis, posttraumatic reconstruction or severe pes planus. However, the complication rate is still high and mainly resulting from inadequate fixation. Special plates, designed for medial column arthrodesis, seem to offer potential to reduce the complication rate. The aim of this study was to investigate biomechanically plantar and dorsomedial fusion of the medial column … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, nitinol devices were placed at the dorsal compression site of the foot to allow continuous compression across the joint while unloading the foot. From this perspective and in alignment with other studies investigating plating of the medial column [33], although a plantar nitinol device placement would be located on the tension site and provide enhanced resistance against plantar gapping, it would conflict with the dogma of superelasticity provided by the nitinol devices and risk injury and irritation to the anterior tibialis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, nitinol devices were placed at the dorsal compression site of the foot to allow continuous compression across the joint while unloading the foot. From this perspective and in alignment with other studies investigating plating of the medial column [33], although a plantar nitinol device placement would be located on the tension site and provide enhanced resistance against plantar gapping, it would conflict with the dogma of superelasticity provided by the nitinol devices and risk injury and irritation to the anterior tibialis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Medicina 2023, 59, x FOR PEER REVIEW Biomechanical testing commenced with initial quasi-static axial ra from 20 N to 150 N at a rate of 13 N/s, followed by progressively increasi loading at 2 Hz with a physiologic profile of each cycle [33]. Whereas the va was held at a constant level of 20 N, the peak load, starting from 150 N, incr of 0.08 N/cycle until 100 mm axial displacement of the machine actuator, w sidered large enough to provoke catastrophic failure of the tested construc Biomechanical testing commenced with initial quasi-static axial ramped loading from 20 N to 150 N at a rate of 13 N/s, followed by progressively increasing cyclic axial loading at 2 Hz with a physiologic profile of each cycle [33]. Whereas the valley cyclic load was held at a constant level of 20 N, the peak load, starting from 150 N, increased at a rate of 0.08 N/cycle until 100 mm axial displacement of the machine actuator, which was considered large enough to provoke catastrophic failure of the tested constructs.…”
Section: Biomechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…most glues are weakest in shear), in addition to being a force that arises during normal locomotion, besides compression, bending and torsion. While tarsal loading has been evaluated in general by using: 1-, 2-and 3-point bending [25,[38][39][40]; pure torsion [23]; compression [41]; shear [26] and multi-modal loading using intact (cadaver) ankles [42] there is no clear consensus on which type(s) of loading are su cient to accurately model forces that arise during locomotion. No other studies have evaluated adhesives for joint xation, and the magnitude of force(s) that arise during joint movement are poorly characterized in canines.…”
Section: Another Potential Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“… 37 A cadaver biomechanical study comparing dorsal vs plantar plating for extended midfoot arthrodesis (TMT and NC combined) demonstrated no difference in construct stiffness and number of loads to failure. 36 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 A cadaver biomechanical study comparing dorsal vs plantar plating for extended midfoot arthrodesis (TMT and NC combined) demonstrated no difference in construct stiffness and number of loads to failure. 36 The authors propose that application of a plantar neutralization plate during NC arthrodesis should function like a tension-band construct to resist plantar-sided gapping and reduce the risk of deformity recurrence. This concept has been used in other areas of foot and ankle surgery with successful clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%