Biomechanical in-vitro study concerning the stability of customized CAD/CAM mandibular reconstruction plates. Comparison of additively and subtractively manufactured as well as hand-bended plates

Wilde, Frank; Kasper, Robin; Sakkas, Andreas; Pietzka, Sebastian; Winter, Karsten; Schramm, Alexander; Mascha, F.

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.465

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Numerous assessments have been appropriated actually for seeing titanium additions with 3D printing; that were created as ordinary and genuinely changed through an action (35). Wilde et al examined two sorts of additions to the extent that biomechanical belongings and assumed that 3D-printed ones suggest predominant constancy and firmness (14).…”

Section: Patient-specific Facial Reconstructionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

New methods for craniofacial bone reconstruction: review

2023

JPTCP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Foundation and Objective: The craniofacial structures are mind-boggling and stylishly the main part of appearance. The objective of the review is to highlight the advances in bone remaking and its likely use in craniofacial skeletal imperfections. Progresses in uniting and tissue move strategies have worked on the careful results however our capacity to completely recover the lost or flawed tissue is restricted. Methods: A point-by-point information-based search utilizing google researcher was performed searching for articles in English with the hunt including the accompanying terms: bone recovery, tissue designing, craniofacial recreation, platforms, and osteoinductive development factors. The inquiry was enhanced by checking references of applicable audit articles. Key Content and Findings: Currently, research and clinical ways to accomplish craniofacial bone recovery are endeavoring to move to new methods to avoid serious medical procedures. Presently, no strategy has been demonstrated to satisfy all qualities expected to supplant autologous uniting as the new best quality level. Conclusions: Currently the highest quality level for craniofacial bone recovery is as yet autologous uniting, yet the obtrusiveness and careful morbidities included have incited exploration to investigate further choices. The fuse of personal computer (PC) helped plans have progressed the capacity to imitate the setups, morphologic attributes, and mechanical capacity of the local site.

show abstract

Section: Patient-specific Facial Reconstructionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

New methods for craniofacial bone reconstruction: review

2023

JPTCP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many studies have been published in recent years regarding comparing 3D-printed titanium implants and those manufactured as standard and manually adapted during an operation [ 70 ]. For example, Wilde et al compared the two types of implants in terms of biomechanical properties and concluded that 3D printed ones offer superior stability and rigidity [ 48 ].…”

Section: Biomaterials For Reconstructionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction—An Overview

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The reconstruction of an orbit after complex craniofacial fractures can be extremely demanding. For satisfactory functional and aesthetic results, it is necessary to restore the orbital walls and the craniofacial skeleton using various types of materials. The reconstruction materials can be divided into autografts (bone or cartilage tissue) or allografts (metals, ceramics, or plastic materials, and combinations of these materials). Over time, different types of materials have been used, considering characteristics such as their stability, biocompatibility, cost, safety, and intraoperative flexibility. Although the ideal material for orbital reconstruction could not be unanimously identified, much progress has been achieved in recent years. In this article, we summarise the advantages and disadvantages of each category of reconstruction materials. We also provide an update on improvements in material properties through various modern processing techniques. Good results in reconstructive surgery of the orbit require both material and technological innovations.

show abstract

Biomechanical in-vitro study concerning the stability of customized CAD/CAM mandibular reconstruction plates. Comparison of additively and subtractively manufactured as well as hand-bended plates

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

New methods for craniofacial bone reconstruction: review

New methods for craniofacial bone reconstruction: review

Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction—An Overview

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About