2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical evaluation of the consolidation period of alveolar distraction osteogenesis with three-dimensional finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A ratio of 1:3.5:7 was found for horizontal, vertical and oblique loads during chewing by Koolstar [11]. Accordingly, the 30 N horizontal load, 105 N vertical load and 210 N oblique load were applied on the lingual cusp of left maxillary first molar, respectively, similar to Veziroglu's studies [12].…”
Section: F Boundary Conditions Materials Properties and Loading Condsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A ratio of 1:3.5:7 was found for horizontal, vertical and oblique loads during chewing by Koolstar [11]. Accordingly, the 30 N horizontal load, 105 N vertical load and 210 N oblique load were applied on the lingual cusp of left maxillary first molar, respectively, similar to Veziroglu's studies [12].…”
Section: F Boundary Conditions Materials Properties and Loading Condsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…It has been suggested that ADO may be more prone to minor complications than the inlay procedure and should not be the first choice of treatment for correcting the height of vertical alveolar bone (28). During activation, the apparatus may cause discomfort to the patient (29), or break and jeopardise implant placement (30). Also, like all distraction operations, ADO is time‐consuming for the patients as well as for the dental surgeons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on the suitability of DI and bone healing process after distraction have been already published. Veziroglu and Yilmaz (29) studied the necessary minimum consolidation period for implant insertion and found that the data from 16th week were optimal, but values obtained at 8th week were sufficient. Feichtinger et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input data used in this study, including the properties of all elements used in the computational model, were based on the literature [18][19][20] and on actual laboratory data obtained from measurements of sheep subjected to DO, and are listed in Table 1. According to Nagasao et al, 21 the masticatory force generated in the molar region ranges from 75 to 300 N. The horizontal (30 N), vertical (105 N) and oblique (210 N) masticatory loads used by Veziroglu and Yilmaz 20 in their study were the same that were applied on the implant crown in the simulation performed in this study. Loads were exerted separately in these three directions, on 10 points over the surface of the implant crown.…”
Section: Construction Of Finite Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For measurement of these stresses and displacements in the present simulation, the masticatory forces generated at a molar were used as the load for simulation, as described in the literature by many authors, such as Nagasao et al 21 and Veziroglu and Yilmaz. 20 To Mehra and Figueroa, 1 DO is a surgical technique that takes advantage of the body's own repair mechanisms for reconstruction of soft tissue and bone. In this study, mandibles were elongated by 15 mm, and neoformed bone was subjected to nanohardness testing after only 30, 20, and 13 days of consolidation.…”
Section: Finite Element Analysis In Distraction Osteogenesis 431 Discmentioning
confidence: 99%