2019
DOI: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Evaluation of Internal Fixation of Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review of Various Fixation Methods

Abstract: Background The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate various fixation methods or implants used in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. Methods PubMed Central, OVID Medline, Cochrane Collaboration Library, Web of Science, Embase, and AHRQ databases were searched to identify relevant studies published until August 2017 with English language restriction. Studies were selected on the basis of the following inclusion criteria: biomechanica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When these data are interpreted clinically, it is obvious that increasing the angle of fracture results in increased instability. In the Pauwels classification, fracture angles of more than 50 o are classified as Type 3 and these angles are associated with high instability and complication rates [3,8,20,21]. However, our study results show that notable differences occur across fracture angles ranging from 30 o to 50 o , whereas biomechanical differences occur less at angles of more than 50 o .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When these data are interpreted clinically, it is obvious that increasing the angle of fracture results in increased instability. In the Pauwels classification, fracture angles of more than 50 o are classified as Type 3 and these angles are associated with high instability and complication rates [3,8,20,21]. However, our study results show that notable differences occur across fracture angles ranging from 30 o to 50 o , whereas biomechanical differences occur less at angles of more than 50 o .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Based on the angle of the fracture line in the coronal plane, angles of up to 30 degrees are classified as type 1, angles between 30 degrees-50 degrees are classified as type 2, and angles higher than 50 degrees are classified as type 3 [7]. Several studies report that high fracture angles in the coronal plane increase the likelihood of failure after fixation with cannulated screws, thereby, resulting in increased rates of postoperative complications [8,9]. Despite many studies investigating this subject matter in the literature, more studies are needed to understand biomechanical changes and complications that may occur in association with different fracture configurations [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En 2019, Cha y cols. 28 publican una revisión sistemática de la bibliografía sobre esta controversia. Evalúan 18 estudios y concluyen en que la mayoría compara resultados mecánicos y no clínicos, por lo que es imposible determinar qué opción de implante es mejor para cada situación.…”
Section: Elección Del Implanteunclassified
“…Hollow nails and medial support plates are an emerging treatment method that can be used to treat Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures [13][14][15]. At present, a medial femoral neck support plate combined with hollow screw internal fixation is an emerging treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture in clinical practice [16,17]. However, whether it can accelerate fracture healing and reduce femoral head necrosis is still controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%