Biomechanical energy harvesting from human motion: theory, state of the art, design guidelines, and future directions

Abstract

BackgroundBiomechanical energy harvesting from human motion presents a promising clean alternative to electrical power supplied by batteries for portable electronic devices and for computerized and motorized prosthetics. We present the theory of energy harvesting from the human body and describe the amount of energy that can be harvested from body heat and from motions of various parts of the body during walking, such as heel strike; ankle, knee, hip, shoulder, and elbow joint motion; and center of mass vertical motion.MethodsWe evaluated major motions performed during walking and identified the amount of work the body expends and the portion of recoverable energy. During walking, there are phases of the motion at the joints where muscles act as brakes and energy is lost to the surroundings. During those phases of motion, the required braking force or torque can be replaced by an electrical generator, allowing energy to be harvested at the cost of only minimal additional effort. The amount of energy that can be harvested was estimated experimentally and from literature data. Recommendations for future directions are made on the basis of our results in combination with a review of state-of-the-art biomechanical energy harvesting devices and energy conversion methods.ResultsFor a device that uses center of mass motion, the maximum amount of energy that can be harvested is approximately 1 W per kilogram of device weight. For a person weighing 80 kg and walking at approximately 4 km/h, the power generation from the heel strike is approximately 2 W. For a joint-mounted device based on generative braking, the joints generating the most power are the knees (34 W) and the ankles (20 W).ConclusionsOur theoretical calculations align well with current device performance data. Our results suggest that the most energy can be harvested from the lower limb joints, but to do so efficiently, an innovative and light-weight mechanical design is needed. We also compared the option of carrying batteries to the metabolic cost of harvesting the energy, and examined the advantages of methods for conversion of mechanical energy into electrical energy.

A methodology for low-speed broadband rotational energy harvesting using piezoelectric transduction and frequency up-conversion

“…the human body or vibrating machinery) is typically much larger than the intended generator, and so the need to attach the harvester to both the moving body and a stationary base, or to two locations moving relative to each other (e.g. upper and lower leg [14]), places severe constraints on both the degree of miniaturisation and on usable locations.…”

Toward Soft Skin‐Like Wearable and Implantable Energy Devices

“…However, the small temperature gradients of human body and loss of latent heat through evaporation of sweat limited the total power that could be converted by wearable thermoelectric generators. [2,118] The efficiency of thermoelectric conversion is largely determined by the active materials. Semiconductor materials are promising candidates for TEGs because they have Seebeck coefficients larger than 100 µV °C −1 .…”

“…This challenge can be, in principle, overcome by MTS or STS strategy. Typically, mechanical energy (such as heart beats, [116] blood flow, [117] walking, [118] breathing, [119] and stretching of muscles) [120] and body heat are two main energy sources for electricity generation. [120] To date, stretchable electricity generators can be categorized into three types: stretchable piezoelectric generators, stretchable triboelectric generators, and wearable thermoelectric generators.…”

Design of Biomechanical Legs with a Passive Toe Joint for Enhanced Human-like Walking

“…Another major factor considered in the selection of these motors is the angular speed of motors required to produce a gait similar to human gait. Since the angular velocity for a human joint is, approximately, 20 rpm (Riemer and Shapiro 2011), which is equal to 120 degree per second, these two motors were selected so that they could perform well at this speed.…”