2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical effect of selective osteotomy and corticotomy on orthodontic molar uprighting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They suggested that the transitory osteopenia generated by the injury to accelerate tooth movement would allow the shift of the centre of rotation of the movement more apically, favouring larger tooth movement for the corticotomized tooth, particularly for uncontrolled tipping. She et al [ 73 ] also used finite element analysis to show the biomechanical effect of selective osteotomy and corticotomy on orthodontic molar uprighting and revealed how the different combinations of corticotomies had a biomechanical impact on orthodontic molar uprighting. They concluded the most extensive surgical approaches resulted in increased tooth movement, which supports Frost’s [ 15 ] description of the RAP where the stimulus magnitude determines the size of the affected region and the intensity of the response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggested that the transitory osteopenia generated by the injury to accelerate tooth movement would allow the shift of the centre of rotation of the movement more apically, favouring larger tooth movement for the corticotomized tooth, particularly for uncontrolled tipping. She et al [ 73 ] also used finite element analysis to show the biomechanical effect of selective osteotomy and corticotomy on orthodontic molar uprighting and revealed how the different combinations of corticotomies had a biomechanical impact on orthodontic molar uprighting. They concluded the most extensive surgical approaches resulted in increased tooth movement, which supports Frost’s [ 15 ] description of the RAP where the stimulus magnitude determines the size of the affected region and the intensity of the response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%