Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical comparison of locked plating and spiral blade retrograde nailing of supracondylar femur fractures

Abstract: The RAFN constructs experienced greater subsidence and reduced axial stiffness compared to the LCP constructs. In Low BMD specimens, the RAFN constructs had a higher risk of failure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2,[6][7][8] Although distal femur replacing total knee replacement, angled blade plates, and other methods have been successfully used to treat distal femur fractures in the elderly patients, locked plating and intramedullary nailing remain the current standards of operative care. [9][10][11][12] Nevertheless, high rates of complications and mortalities continue to be reported in all methods of internal fixation for distal femur fractures in the elderly patients. 1,2,8,13 Although multiple studies have assessed the biomechanical properties, functional scores, and complication rates of surgical treatment for distal femur fractures in the elderly patients, few studies have investigated the patient's quality of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,[6][7][8] Although distal femur replacing total knee replacement, angled blade plates, and other methods have been successfully used to treat distal femur fractures in the elderly patients, locked plating and intramedullary nailing remain the current standards of operative care. [9][10][11][12] Nevertheless, high rates of complications and mortalities continue to be reported in all methods of internal fixation for distal femur fractures in the elderly patients. 1,2,8,13 Although multiple studies have assessed the biomechanical properties, functional scores, and complication rates of surgical treatment for distal femur fractures in the elderly patients, few studies have investigated the patient's quality of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, to simulate the real‐life situation, we chose to use anti‐corrosion cadaver bone instead of artificial bone. As a well‐established modeling technique for biomechanical study of the distal femur, a 1‐cm transverse osteotomy was created 6 cm from the intercondylar fossa. Generally, this kind of absolute bone defect is rarely encountered in the clinic, and fracture fragments fill the gap, so the stress stiffness of the implants inside the body would be greater than that in our biomechanical study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1,2 Internal fixation needs to provide enough rigidity, compression, and have adequate durability (fatigue life) to promote bone healing. 2,3 Intramedullary rods are implanted along the axis of the center of mass and provide better durability than plates, but are not as rigid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between these two fixation methods have different biomechanical and clinical outcome considerations. [1][2][3][4][5] Intramedullary rods have become the preferred clinical choice for femoral shaft non-union. 2,3 A rod with improved durability might be useful for situations with prolonged healing such as bulk allografts, and severe bone defects as is seen with high-energy trauma and metastatic bone disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation