SAE Technical Paper Series 2010
DOI: 10.4271/2010-22-0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical and Injury Response to Posterolateral Loading From Torso Side Airbags

Abstract: This study characterized thoracoabdominal response to posterolateral loading from a seat-mounted side airbag. Seven unembalmed post-mortem human subjects were exposed to ten airbag deployments. Subjects were positioned such that the deploying airbag first contacted the posterolateral thorax between T6 and L1 while stationary (n = 3 × 2 aspects) or while subjected to left lateral sled impact at ΔV = 6.7 m/s (n = 4). Chestband contours were analyzed to quantify deformation direction in the thoracic x–y plane (ze… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rib fractures are a good indicator of the severity of an impact to the thorax as the protection to the internal organs such as the lungs and the heart is greatly reduced with the increasing number of fractured ribs (abbreviated injury scale, AAAM ( 2008)). Injury mechanisms for the ribs and the whole rib cage have been widely studied, either through experiments (Kent et al, 2004;Vezin and Berthet, 2009;Kuppa and Eppinger, 1998;Trosseille et al, 2008;Hallman et al, 2010;Petitjean et al, 2003;Lessley et al, 2010b) or computational simulations (Murakami et al, 2006;Lizée et al, 1998;Song et al, 2009;Robin, 2001;Vezin and Verriest, 2005;Shigeta et al, 2009;Kimpara et al, 2005;Plank and Eppinger, 1989;Ruan et al, 2003;Li et al, 2010a,b;Kimpara et al, 2006) to determine injury mechanisms and thresholds under diverse load conditions. A significant milestone was achieved in the characterization of the strength of the thorax by accounting for the geo-metrical variations in the rib cage and the rib themselves, and for the effects of biological variations such as aging (Berthet et al, 2005;Ito et al, 2009;Gayzik et al, 2008;Kent et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rib fractures are a good indicator of the severity of an impact to the thorax as the protection to the internal organs such as the lungs and the heart is greatly reduced with the increasing number of fractured ribs (abbreviated injury scale, AAAM ( 2008)). Injury mechanisms for the ribs and the whole rib cage have been widely studied, either through experiments (Kent et al, 2004;Vezin and Berthet, 2009;Kuppa and Eppinger, 1998;Trosseille et al, 2008;Hallman et al, 2010;Petitjean et al, 2003;Lessley et al, 2010b) or computational simulations (Murakami et al, 2006;Lizée et al, 1998;Song et al, 2009;Robin, 2001;Vezin and Verriest, 2005;Shigeta et al, 2009;Kimpara et al, 2005;Plank and Eppinger, 1989;Ruan et al, 2003;Li et al, 2010a,b;Kimpara et al, 2006) to determine injury mechanisms and thresholds under diverse load conditions. A significant milestone was achieved in the characterization of the strength of the thorax by accounting for the geo-metrical variations in the rib cage and the rib themselves, and for the effects of biological variations such as aging (Berthet et al, 2005;Ito et al, 2009;Gayzik et al, 2008;Kent et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have implications in the biomechanics of restraints such as side-impact airbags and loadings specific to organs (spleen, kidney). Posterolateral impact studies have been initiated by subjecting stationary PMHS (Hallman et al, 2010). Use of oblique load-wall configuration aimed at posterolateral impacts overcomes the lack of inertial effects in stationary surrogate tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual response of a single rib was the subject of an optimization study [41]. The abdomen was validated in various tests using bar impacts with a free back [42,43], belt loading with a free back [43], airbag loading with a fixed back [43], belt loading at the mid abdomen [44,45], pendulum impact [46], organ level validation at impact [47], lumbar flexion [48], lateral impact [49] and side airbag loading [50]. The pelvis was validated in lateral compression at the acetabulum [51][52][53] and pubic symphysis [54].…”
Section: Occupant Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%