2016
DOI: 10.2134/agronj15.0182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass Production and Carbon/Nitrogen Ratio Influence Ecosystem Services from Cover Crop Mixtures

Abstract: Increasing plant diversity in agroecosystems with cover crops has been a successful strategy to augment ecosystem services from agriculture, and increasing diversity of cover crops may provide even greater benefi ts. Productivity and ecosystem services from multi-species cover crop mixtures were measured in a 2-yr fi eld study of 18 cover crop treatments preceding conventionally tilled corn in central Pennsylvania. Increasing the number of species in a stand increased cover crop biomass (R 2 = 0.15). However, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
363
5
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 378 publications
(444 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
36
363
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In Mediterranean climate, similar results were found in experiments that compared soil tillage and service crop treatments, with evidences of changes in weed community structure and dynamics (Monteiro and Lopes, 2007), and lower infestation by weeds under sown service crops (Gago et al, 2007). In other cropping systems, weed suppression was positively correlated to service crop biomass (service crop dominance on weeds) and C/N ratio (N retention, decomposition rate) (Finney et al, 2016;Vrignon-Brenas et al, 2016).…”
Section: Weed Controlsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Mediterranean climate, similar results were found in experiments that compared soil tillage and service crop treatments, with evidences of changes in weed community structure and dynamics (Monteiro and Lopes, 2007), and lower infestation by weeds under sown service crops (Gago et al, 2007). In other cropping systems, weed suppression was positively correlated to service crop biomass (service crop dominance on weeds) and C/N ratio (N retention, decomposition rate) (Finney et al, 2016;Vrignon-Brenas et al, 2016).…”
Section: Weed Controlsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Competition for nitrogen may occur, as available N can be depleted by service crops during grapevine dormancy, and stuck in an organic form (alive or dead plants) before being released by mineralization (ThorupKristensen et al, 2003). It is known that the amount of nitrogen made available for the next or associated crop will depend on the C/N ratio of the service crop (Finney et al, 2016) and the biomass produced (Vrignon-Brenas et al, 2016). Indeed, service crop mixtures including leguminous and non-leguminous species can combine NO3-leaching reduction and green manure services, thus improving N use in cropping systems (Tribouillois et al, 2016).…”
Section: Soil Chemical Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The winter-killed cover crops, namely soybean, sunn hemp, and forage radish, were associated with higher proportions of actinomycetes and Gram-positive bacteria (figure 2b). Again differences in biomass production by winter-killed versus winter-hardy cover crop species (Finney et al 2016) may have led to this result in spring. In other words, cover crops that provided C inputs to the microbial community in both fall and spring led to higher proportions of AM fungi, protozoa, Gram-negative bacteria, and non-AM fungi in the soil microbial community by spring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We also measured cover crop and arable weed biomass in fall prior to the first killing frost and spring immediately prior to termination by clipping within quadrats. Aboveground biomass data have previously been reported in Finney et al (2016).Soil Sampling. Bulk soil samples were collected in fall at the time of peak cover crop growth and spring approximately one week prior to cover crop termination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, crop mixtures produce more biomass as species richness increases [80], but the biomass is lower than high-yielding monocultures [81]. In general, for forage and biofuel production, both the yield quantity and quality are important; as such, they are both considered for the analysis.…”
Section: Biomass Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%