2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00149-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass power cost and optimum plant size in western Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
150
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 296 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
150
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Dornburg and Faaij [47] the influences of logistics on the total costs increases with the scale of the plant, due to increasing the supplying areas therefore having higher transportation distances. Therefore, both the yield of biomass per unit area and the location of the biomass have an impact also when determining the optimum size of a power plant [48]. Follow up studies should compare the supply costs between the other two peat power stations in Ireland.…”
Section: Effect Of MC On Supply Chain Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Dornburg and Faaij [47] the influences of logistics on the total costs increases with the scale of the plant, due to increasing the supplying areas therefore having higher transportation distances. Therefore, both the yield of biomass per unit area and the location of the biomass have an impact also when determining the optimum size of a power plant [48]. Follow up studies should compare the supply costs between the other two peat power stations in Ireland.…”
Section: Effect Of MC On Supply Chain Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bigger plants demand more material and results in bigger supply areas which in turn increases transport distances and costs (Dornburg & Faaij 2001). Also, both the yield of biomass per unit area and the location of the biomass have an impact on the optimum size and location of the power plants (Kumar et al 2003).…”
Section: Costs Of Satisfying the Increasing Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gives a surplus of 2.2 million tons straw/year or 40 % of the total production [1]. The straw-to-grain ratio is assumed to be 1.1:1 on the basis of its mass fraction [22]. Accordingly, a portion of the impact from common operations for straw and grain (from cultivation to harvesting) is allocated to straw.…”
Section: Biomass Production/supplymentioning
confidence: 99%