1996
DOI: 10.1051/forest:19960603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass, litterfall and nutrient content in Castanea sativa coppice stands of southern Europe

Abstract: Summary -Aboveground biomass and nutrient content, litterfall and nutrient return to the soil were studied in Castanea sativa Mill forests near Salamanca (Spain), Montpellier (France)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Geographic coordinates were recorded at the centre of each plot with a Trimble® GeoXM™ GPS with 1-3 meter accuracy. Specific allometric equations (Leonardi et al 1996;Hamburg et al 1997;Gasparini et al 1998;Zianis et al 2005;Alberti et al 2006;Tabacchi et al, 2011) were used to calculate total aboveground tree biomass and subsequently plot-level biomass (mg•ha…”
Section: Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographic coordinates were recorded at the centre of each plot with a Trimble® GeoXM™ GPS with 1-3 meter accuracy. Specific allometric equations (Leonardi et al 1996;Hamburg et al 1997;Gasparini et al 1998;Zianis et al 2005;Alberti et al 2006;Tabacchi et al, 2011) were used to calculate total aboveground tree biomass and subsequently plot-level biomass (mg•ha…”
Section: Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DBH appeared to be the best predictor of root system biomass and biomass increment, as is commonly found for the biomass of aerial tree compartments [2,14,16,25,32,37] and also for the few studies dealing with root systems [9,30]. Generally, linear relationships can be adjusted after a two-sided logarithmic transformation [2,4,30,35].…”
Section: Biomass and Biomass Increment Of Root Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological and anatomical measurements were carried out in YC and OC, to point out differences between the different ages [16,35]. Morphological leaf traits were analysed on 50 fully expanded leaves ( The following parameters were measured: projected leaf surface area (excluding petiole) (LSA, cm 2 ), obtained by the Image Analysis System (Delta-T Devices, UK); leaf dry mass (LDM, mg), determined drying at 80 °C to constant mass.…”
Section: Morphological and Anatomical Leaf Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%