2001
DOI: 10.1051/forest:2001104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root biomass and biomass increment in a beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stand in North-East France

Abstract: -This study is part of a larger project aimed at quantifying the biomass and biomass increment of an experimental beech stand aged 30 years, and comparing the carbon sequestration in trees to carbon fluxes. The below ground part of trees is expected to play an important role in carbon sequestration. A method has been developed to estimate the biomass and biomass increment of coarse, small and fine roots of trees from root system excavations of sampled trees of different crown classes. The biomass and biomass i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
98
1
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(27 reference statements)
13
98
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…So as different plant species develop different adaptations for their survival in a given environment, meaningful comparisons between root characteristics and their distribution in tropical forests under varied environmental conditions are difficult. Further, root biomass production depends on the species composition and ecological conditions (Goff and Ottorini, 2001). However, the root estimates recorded in the secondary forest are comparable to the few estimates for other tropical secondary forests (Berish, 1982;Hopkins et al, 1996;Raich, 1983), but comparisons of secondary forests are also difficult due to the confounding influence of forest age and structure.…”
Section: Root Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…So as different plant species develop different adaptations for their survival in a given environment, meaningful comparisons between root characteristics and their distribution in tropical forests under varied environmental conditions are difficult. Further, root biomass production depends on the species composition and ecological conditions (Goff and Ottorini, 2001). However, the root estimates recorded in the secondary forest are comparable to the few estimates for other tropical secondary forests (Berish, 1982;Hopkins et al, 1996;Raich, 1983), but comparisons of secondary forests are also difficult due to the confounding influence of forest age and structure.…”
Section: Root Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…There were three types of branches: (i) upper branches exposed to full sunlight (= sun-exposed branches), (ii) lower branches were heavily shaded in 1998 by upper crown branches and surrounding trees (= shade branches) and (iii) branches exposed directly to full sun after thinning in 1999 (= thinned branches). More details about the stand structure are published elsewhere [7,12,[14][15][16] and microclimate is characterised in table I for each treatment. Branch morphology, xylem anatomy and water relations were measured on the five trees accessible from towers.…”
Section: Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar way as described by Le Goff and Ottorini [27], the biomass of missing root ends of each tree was estimated to obtain annual biomass increments of the root systems. This was done, in addition, accounting, where possible, for the morphological type of roots (tape, horizontal).…”
Section: Root Biomass Incrementmentioning
confidence: 99%