2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.06.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass gasification systems for residential application: An integrated simulation approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, even if the improvement of the distributed generation through the adoption of biomass stoves would be the scenario with the lower investment costs, it can be argued that the ultimate solution should be reducing indoor direct combustion, rather than reforming it [66]. In this perspective, the Scenario 2 considers a centralized CHP plant based on reed gasification, suiting a previously developed multistage model of a CHP biomass plant [71]. The power plant layout (Fig.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, even if the improvement of the distributed generation through the adoption of biomass stoves would be the scenario with the lower investment costs, it can be argued that the ultimate solution should be reducing indoor direct combustion, rather than reforming it [66]. In this perspective, the Scenario 2 considers a centralized CHP plant based on reed gasification, suiting a previously developed multistage model of a CHP biomass plant [71]. The power plant layout (Fig.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The subsidy consists of a high feed-in tariff on the electricity generated by the plant e main share of the incentive e and a bonus for the only electricity generated in high efficiency cogeneration [33] e negligible share of the incentive. Further information about the influence of the subsidisation on the business plan of a biomass CHP plant is reported in literature [21].…”
Section: Orc Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the performance in real operation can considerably differ from the nominal one due to the custom installation and the matching between heat supply and heat demand. Moreover, the national energy policy, with the subsidization of the electricity production from power plant based on non-photovoltaic renewable sources [20], distorts the worth of electricity and heat, strongly promoting the electric generation and penalising the heat valorisation [21]. As a consequence, CHP systems with low, or even negative, primary energy saving could have a positive cash flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking these benefits into account, various conversion technologies have been used for CHP applications, such as steam Rankine cycle, Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), Stirling engine, internal combustion engine, gas turbine and fuel cell [1]. Each one exhibits own advantages according to the heat source used, fossil fuels or renewable energy, temperature application range or thermal and electrical power requirements [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%