2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-015-0395-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass accessibility analysis using electron tomography

Abstract: BackgroundSubstrate accessibility to catalysts has been a dominant theme in theories of biomass deconstruction. However, current methods of quantifying accessibility do not elucidate mechanisms for increased accessibility due to changes in microstructure following pretreatment.ResultsWe introduce methods for characterization of surface accessibility based on fine-scale microstructure of the plant cell wall as revealed by 3D electron tomography. These methods comprise a general framework, enabling analysis of i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reconstruction of microfibril organization in cell walls has also been attempted by use of electron tomography of thin cross‐sections of cell walls (Xu et al ., ; Ciesielski et al ., ; Sarkar et al ., ; Hinkle et al ., ). This involves substantial labor and image processing, yet the results to date do not render microfibrils and their organizations within individual lamellae with the clarity evident in the AFM images of onion epidermal walls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Reconstruction of microfibril organization in cell walls has also been attempted by use of electron tomography of thin cross‐sections of cell walls (Xu et al ., ; Ciesielski et al ., ; Sarkar et al ., ; Hinkle et al ., ). This involves substantial labor and image processing, yet the results to date do not render microfibrils and their organizations within individual lamellae with the clarity evident in the AFM images of onion epidermal walls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A strong case can be made that substrate characterization in biorefinery has emerged as a research field in its own right. Characterization of biorefinery resources has been examined by several state-of-the-art analytical techniques including Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) 2 , fluorescence spectroscopy 3 , HPLC 4 , gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) 5 , NMR spectroscopy 6 , gel permeation chromatography (GPC) 7 , scanning electron microscopy 8 , tunneling electron microscopy 9 , atomic force microscopy 10 , Raman spectrometry 11 , time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) 12 , and small-angle neutron scattering 13 along with a host of wet-chemistry and biological assays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical techniques to estimate plant cell wall porosity such as solute exclusion [ 11 ] and Simon’s Stain method [ 12 ] only give an indirect indication of specific molecules accessibility to plant cell wall components according to their size. Electron tomography can be used to directly assess pores size but requires drying the samples which might induce possible collapsing of the pores [ 13 ]. Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was recently used to study the interactions and retention of water molecules by the plant cell wall constituents in pretreated spruce [ 14 , 15 ] and bagasse samples [ 16 ] showing positive correlation between water accessibility and biomass hydrolysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%