2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioluminescent and micro-computed tomography imaging of bone repair induced by fibrin-binding growth factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vila et al also used fibrin glue for the controlled delivery of an engineered form of PDGF and BMP-2 to enhance bone and vasculature formation in mouse calvarial defects. 177 The same approach is involved in the delivery of parathyroid hormone (PTH1-34) which increases bone turnover via a direct and indirect effect on osteoblasts and osteoclasts. In a study by Arrighi et al, 178 an inactive prodrug TG-pl-PTH1-34 was immobilized to fibrin as in the case of TG-pl-BMP-2 (see section BMP delivery).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vila et al also used fibrin glue for the controlled delivery of an engineered form of PDGF and BMP-2 to enhance bone and vasculature formation in mouse calvarial defects. 177 The same approach is involved in the delivery of parathyroid hormone (PTH1-34) which increases bone turnover via a direct and indirect effect on osteoblasts and osteoclasts. In a study by Arrighi et al, 178 an inactive prodrug TG-pl-PTH1-34 was immobilized to fibrin as in the case of TG-pl-BMP-2 (see section BMP delivery).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boundary condition at the distal layer was adapted from the experimental release kinetics data, and the surrounding tissue was modeled as infinite sink PDGF-BB, which has a low affinity for fibrin within the porous structure. 35,36 Hence, it was assumed that PDGF-BB did not interact with the scaffold. The effective diffusion coefficient within the scaffold was calculated by fitting the model to experimental results to account for both steric effects of the scaffold structure and any binding to fibrin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSCs have long been recognized as clinically relevant cells for bone applications due to their ability to differentiate down an osteogenic lineage not only in vitro, as is widely known, but also in vivo [65]. Vila et al demonstrated, using a dual-luciferase tracking system in which MSCs were transduced to express luciferase driven by constitutive and osteocalcin (OC)-responsive promoters, that MSCs implanted into calvarial defects in mice greatly upregulated their expression of osteocalcin, a late-marker for osteogenic differentiation [66]. In addition to their osteogenic capabilities, the ability to isolate MSCs from either bone marrow or adipose tissue, their immunosuppressive phenotype and the potential for utilization in autologous therapies make these cells alluring for both clinicians and researchers [67, 68].…”
Section: Current Strategies For Vascularization and Bone Regeneratmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this endothelial potential does not seem evident when these cells are implanted within a bone defect. In the same study showing positive osteocalcin expression of MSCs, Vila et al also transduced MSCs to express a luciferase-dependent promoter for PECAM1, an endothelial-specific marker, and observed a decrease in PECAM1 expression when MSCs were implanted within a bone defect but an increased expression when implanted intra-muscularly denoting how the microenvironmental cues influence the fate of implanted cells [66]. Although MSCs do not themselves differentiate down an endothelial lineage when implanted in a bone defect, they appear to aid in recruiting endogenous endothelial cells to begin vascular repair [76].…”
Section: Current Strategies For Vascularization and Bone Regeneratmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation