2013
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological variation and reference change values of common clinical chemistry and haematologic laboratory analytes in the elderly population

Abstract: The strong individuality observed supports the preferential use of RCVs rather than population-based reference intervals in elderly people. For most of the analytes studied, data from the young population can be applied to elderly people, but the specific elderly coefficients of BV and RCVs are a recommended option.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data in Table 1 are ordered according the author and publication; also the reference numbers are shown [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data in Table 1 are ordered according the author and publication; also the reference numbers are shown [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study design (number of subjects, samples from each subject, and number of replicates) has a great impact on the reliability with which we can estimate the BV data and on the confidence intervals (CI) for the calculated CVs. There are a few published papers reporting BV data calculated from a large numbers of subjects [22][23][24][25][26]. Those studies involve a low number of collections from each subject (from four to six), often with measurements performed in singleton on the day of the collection.…”
Section: Post-analytical Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39] As a consequence, the study cannot assess a preference of population-based reference intervals over intraindividual reference changing values. [7] External validity is impaired by the fact that the investigated cohort consists entirely of participants with Caucasian descent. As a consequence, the evaluated reference intervals might not be extrapolated to persons with other racial backgrounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[57] These reference intervals are most often obtained from investigations in healthy adult persons aged <60 years. [8,9] Although elderly persons sometimes are regarded as elderly versions of adults, from a physiopathological viewpoint, seniors—analogously to children—have their distinct own biology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%