Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies was asked to provide a scientific opinion on a list of health claims pursuant to Article 13 of Regulation (EC) in the framework of further assessment related to lutein and maintenance of normal vision. The food constituent that is the subject of the claim, lutein, is sufficiently characterised. The claimed effect, maintenance of normal vision, is a beneficial physiological effect. The proposed target population is the general population. In weighing the evidence, the Panel took into account that one human intervention study in healthy subjects did not show an effect of lutein on visual acuity or glare sensitivity, that the results of this study were inconsistent as regards contrast sensitivity, and that the evidence provided for a mechanism by which lutein could exert the claimed effect in vivo in humans is weak. On the basis of the data presented, the Panel concludes that the evidence provided is insufficient to establish a cause and effect relationship between the consumption of lutein and maintenance of normal vision. . The Commission has agreed with EU Member States that a certain number of Article 13 health claims would be eligible for further assessment by EFSA in order to be able to take a final decision on whether or not to include these claims in the list of permitted health claims. This opinion addresses the scientific substantiation of a health claim in relation to lutein and maintenance of normal vision. The scientific substantiation is based on the information provided by the Member States in the consolidated list of Article 13 health claims, references that EFSA has received from Member States or directly from stakeholders and the additional information provided by the competent Authority of Austria for further assessment of this claim.The food constituent that is the subject of the health claim is lutein. The Panel considers that lutein is sufficiently characterised.The claimed effect, which is eligible for further assessment, is maintenance of normal vision. The proposed target population is the general population. Visual function, including visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, can be assessed by established methods. The Panel considers that maintenance of normal vision is a beneficial physiological effect.The NDA Panel has already issued two opinions in relation to a claim on lutein and maintenance of normal vision, in which over 200 references which were considered. In the framework of further assessment three human intervention studies, of which only two were on healthy subjects, one human observational study and one case report, as well as a number of animal, in vitro and ex vivo studies were provided. This evaluation is based on the scientific references provided in the present and in the previous submissions which addressed the effects of lutein on maintenance of vision and/or on the mechanisms by which lutein could exert the claimed effect in the target population.Two publ...