2016
DOI: 10.4137/cin.s39458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological Networks for Cancer Candidate Biomarkers Discovery

Abstract: Due to its extraordinary heterogeneity and complexity, cancer is often proposed as a model case of a systems biology disease or network disease. There is a critical need of effective biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and/or outcome prediction from system level analyses. Methods based on integrating omics data into networks have the potential to revolutionize the identification of cancer biomarkers. Deciphering the biological networks underlying cancer is undoubtedly important for understanding the molecular mech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion may be the result of an identification name for identification name comparison, which could miss functional connections. In a living system, different genes, transcripts as well as proteins work in a cooperative way to ensure functional responses [5,6]. Therefore, different genes and proteins may have a similar functional output.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion may be the result of an identification name for identification name comparison, which could miss functional connections. In a living system, different genes, transcripts as well as proteins work in a cooperative way to ensure functional responses [5,6]. Therefore, different genes and proteins may have a similar functional output.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, different genes and proteins may have a similar functional output. Such functional connections would be unveiled by a systemic analysis [5][6][7][8]. Systemic analysis focuses on affected functions rather than on identification names, and may lead to better clinically relevant conclusions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An miRNA-gene network of L. longipalpis was constructed using Cytoscape (Kohl, Wiese & Warscheid, 2011). Topology analysis of the network identified biomarkers in the protein-protein interaction network of disease (Yan et al., 2016). The nodes and edges of the miRNA-gene network were then analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomarkers have been used as input information in artificial neural networks for establishing cancer types and the respective malignancy (see e.g., [10,154,155]). Image fusion techniques have also been used for developing three-dimensional maps of therapeutic doses [156].…”
Section: Mapping Multidimensional Cancer Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, literature regarding cancer theranostics is lacking in comprehensive and systematic approaches to: (1) fully inspect the relevant interaction patterns and synergistic effects, (2) evaluate tumor heterogeneity and data-intensive theranostics technologies, (3) confirm the effectiveness of therapeutics, and (4) compare and validate specific mechanistic models. Fundamental aspects on the cellular and molecular basis of cancer have also been explored through the establishment of relevant biological networks [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. This has been facilitated by combining information from cancer genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data and computational techniques, aiming at developing non-invasive methods for diagnostic purposes [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%