1980
DOI: 10.21236/ada104821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological Damage Threshold Induced by Ultrashort Fundamental, 2nd, and 4th Harmonic Light Pulses from a Mode-Locked Nd: Glass Laser.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…hi this study we compare our results with fliose for botii near-IR and visible wavelengttm previoiwly reported [12], [15], [16], [14], [17], [13], [19], [7] Laser-ocular tissue interaction studio for pulse widths below 1 ns are critical to the development of safety standard [50], [51], and in identifying hazanis to the human eye from those systenB presently operating in the near-IR reghne. An understanding of l^er-tissue interactions is b^ic to identifying the potential for injury and to applying therapeutic medical treatments to laser injury and disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…hi this study we compare our results with fliose for botii near-IR and visible wavelengttm previoiwly reported [12], [15], [16], [14], [17], [13], [19], [7] Laser-ocular tissue interaction studio for pulse widths below 1 ns are critical to the development of safety standard [50], [51], and in identifying hazanis to the human eye from those systenB presently operating in the near-IR reghne. An understanding of l^er-tissue interactions is b^ic to identifying the potential for injury and to applying therapeutic medical treatments to laser injury and disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In this study we are reporting retinal damage thresholds for single laser pulses of near-infrared wavelengths and comparing our resuhs with those for both near-infi-ared and visible wavelengths previously reported. [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23] We have determined the threshold dosages for ophthalmoscopically minimal visible lesions (MVL-ED50) for pulse widths of 150 femtoseconds (fs), 1, 20, and 80 picoseconds (ps) and 7 nanoseconds (ns) and the fluorescein angiography threshold dosages at one-hour and 24-hours post exposure. We have previously reported retinal injury studies of visible wavelengths for pulse widths down to 90 fs for pigmented rabbit eyes [24], [25] and for rhesus monkey eyes.…”
Section: Data Set A; Single-pulse Damage Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Griess et al reported of a cumulative effect for pulse durations of 16 nsec when applying between 1 and 100 pulses with 10 Hz [38]. Bruckner et al [39] reported a comparable dependence for picoseconds, and Stolarski et al [40] for 130 femtosecond pulse durations.…”
Section: Rpe Cell Damage With Multiple Pulse Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…where r l is the radius of the beam at the principal plane of the lens. The value of M 2 gives an important property of the beam in terms of the diffraction-limited beam size. The radius of the focused beam at the minimum waist, r 0 , is given by:…”
Section: Characterization Of Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous dose-response studies that determined the minimum laser energy required to produce retinal damage as a function of wavelength, 1,2 pulse width, [3][4][5][6][7] and repetitive pulses. 8,9 These studies were performed with various lasers and exposure conditions, yet there were consistent trends in the data that reflected a commonness in the animal models used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%