2002
DOI: 10.1177/027836402128964116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological Cell Injection Using an Autonomous MicroRobotic System

Abstract: Recent advances in microbiology, such as cloning, demonstrate that increasingly complex micromanipulation strategies are required for manipulating individual biological cells. In this paper, we present a microrobotic system capable of conducting automatic embryo pronuclei DNA injection (cell injection). Conventionally, cell injection has been conducted manually, however, long training, low success rates from poor reproducibility in manual operations, and contamination all call for the elimination of direct hum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the metrological limitations of the cantilever as a force sensor, few viable alternatives exist [13]. MEMS based force sensors have been used for multiple applications in biological research, such as for measuring forces on single heart cells [14], measuring the injection force on Drosophila embryos [15], studying cell mechanical response [16], characterizing fruit fly behavior and investigation of micromechanical properties of mouse zona pellucida and of soft hydrogel microcapsules [17][18][19]. These sensors are capable of measuring local properties of biological materials and microfabricated MEMS grippers have been demonstrated for quantifying global mechanical properties [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the metrological limitations of the cantilever as a force sensor, few viable alternatives exist [13]. MEMS based force sensors have been used for multiple applications in biological research, such as for measuring forces on single heart cells [14], measuring the injection force on Drosophila embryos [15], studying cell mechanical response [16], characterizing fruit fly behavior and investigation of micromechanical properties of mouse zona pellucida and of soft hydrogel microcapsules [17][18][19]. These sensors are capable of measuring local properties of biological materials and microfabricated MEMS grippers have been demonstrated for quantifying global mechanical properties [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most cellular manipulation systems have primarily focused to date on visual information in conjunction with a dial-based console system. The operator needs extensive training to perform these tasks, and even an experienced operator can have low success rates and a poor reproducibility due to the nature of the tasks (Kallio & Kuncova, 2003;Sun & Nelson, 2002). The developed cell injection system is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Cellular Manipulation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these problems, several single-cell microinjection systems have been proposed to improve the manipulation efficiency. Automated microinjection systems have been developed to remove human involvement from the injection process [10]- [16], where a visual servoing approach is usually used to control the position and force of a micromanipulator; however, it is challenging to create a fully automated manipulation system because microinjection is conducted under diverse and complex conditions such as varying cell size (from one micrometer to hundreds of micrometers), cell types (e.g., suspended or attached ones) and liquid environments. Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there are difficulties in the dexterous manipulation of cells with multiple degrees of freedom (DOF) and in target selection (e.g., cell nucleus or cytoplasm) in visual servoing [17], [18]- [20]. Teleoperated microinjection systems have been developed to provide haptic feedback during manipulation [3], [5], [7], [10], [15], [32]- [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%