2011
DOI: 10.1049/mnl.2011.0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying growth mechanics of living, growing plant cells in situ using microrobotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CFM apparatus is composed primarily of commercially available components: a single-axis capacitive force sensor (Sun and Nelson, 2007) mounted on a three-axis microrobotics actuator (Felekis et al, 2011). The setup is fixed on top of a standard inverted light microscope and isolated from external sources of vibration (Supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Design and Operation Of The Cfm Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CFM apparatus is composed primarily of commercially available components: a single-axis capacitive force sensor (Sun and Nelson, 2007) mounted on a three-axis microrobotics actuator (Felekis et al, 2011). The setup is fixed on top of a standard inverted light microscope and isolated from external sources of vibration (Supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Design and Operation Of The Cfm Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1). Software developed in LabView is used to control the experimental procedure and acquire data (Felekis et al, 2011). A dataanalysis software was developed that automatically extracts the indentation point and apparent stiffness values from the data.…”
Section: Design and Operation Of The Cfm Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used the cellular 342 force microscope (CFM) (Felekis et al, 2011;Vogler et al, 2013) in conjunction with discern direct from secondary effects of the lrx mutations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microindentation probes provides more flexibility in the scanning range and are capable of applying larger forces, but have not previously used in an automated fashion. Microrobotic manipulation combined with MEMS force sensors has been recently introduced as a promising alternative for mechanical characterization at the cellular level [9]- [11]. Due to the symmetric design of this sensor with its four flexures, parallel motion of the movable body during deflection is possible, making this design superior to most cantilever-type sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%